CPIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iBio has a net margin of -16.99% compared to Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -4444.57%. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -38.11% beat iBio's return on equity of -148.3%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 272.81%. On the other hand iBio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.16%. Given that Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than iBio, analysts believe Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than iBio.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iBio has a beta of -3.237, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 423.713%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iBio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iBio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are larger than iBio quarterly revenues of $175K. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.5M is higher than iBio's net income of -$4M. Notably, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iBio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is 0.87x versus -- for iBio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eli Lilly and has a net margin of -16.99% compared to Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net margin of 8.48%. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -38.11% beat Eli Lilly and's return on equity of 66.4%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 272.81%. On the other hand Eli Lilly and has an analysts' consensus of $984.05 which suggests that it could grow by 28.17%. Given that Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Eli Lilly and, analysts believe Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Eli Lilly and.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eli Lilly and has a beta of 0.409, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.07%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eli Lilly and offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eli Lilly and pays out 77.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Eli Lilly and's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are smaller than Eli Lilly and quarterly revenues of $11.4B. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Eli Lilly and's net income of $970.3M. Notably, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eli Lilly and's PE ratio is 83.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is 0.87x versus 16.99x for Eli Lilly and. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -16.99% compared to Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -49.65%. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -38.11% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 272.81%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 602.96%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Cumberland Pharmaceuticals.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.383%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.5M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is 0.87x versus 0.06x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -16.99% compared to Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -2357.27%. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -38.11% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 272.81%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1656.38%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Cumberland Pharmaceuticals.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.299, which suggesting that the stock is 70.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $9.1M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumberland Pharmaceuticals is 0.87x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.