Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
Buy
74
CLSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.45
Seasonality move
:
-0.62%
Day range:
$20.41 - $20.47
52-week range:
$18.24 - $22.00
Dividend yield:
2.12%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
36.4K
Avg. volume:
32.9K
1-year change:
1.22%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FIRS
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
|
$20.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 2.12% | -- |
|
FIRS
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF
|
$20.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0% | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
$19.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0% | -- |
|
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
$33.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 1.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
|
-- | 0.579 | -- | -- |
|
FIRS
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
-- | 0.660 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FIRS
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLSM or FIRS?
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net margin of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's return on equity of -- beat FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- FIRSFIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLSM or FIRS?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has higher upside potential than FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF, analysts believe Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is more attractive than FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF0 0 0 FIRSFIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF0 0 0 -
Is CLSM or FIRS More Risky?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLSM or FIRS?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLSM or FIRS?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net income of -- is lower than FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is -- versus -- for FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- -- FIRSFIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLSM or NDAA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net margin of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's return on equity of -- beat Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLSM or NDAA?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has higher upside potential than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF, analysts believe Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is more attractive than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF0 0 0 NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is CLSM or NDAA More Risky?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLSM or NDAA?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLSM or NDAA?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net income of -- is lower than Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is -- versus -- for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- -- NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLSM or OCIO?
ClearShares OCIO ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net margin of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's return on equity of -- beat ClearShares OCIO ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- OCIOClearShares OCIO ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLSM or OCIO?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearShares OCIO ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has higher upside potential than ClearShares OCIO ETF, analysts believe Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is more attractive than ClearShares OCIO ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF0 0 0 OCIOClearShares OCIO ETF0 0 0 -
Is CLSM or OCIO More Risky?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearShares OCIO ETF has a beta of 0.590, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.952%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLSM or OCIO?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. ClearShares OCIO ETF offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearShares OCIO ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLSM or OCIO?
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearShares OCIO ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's net income of -- is lower than ClearShares OCIO ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearShares OCIO ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF is -- versus -- for ClearShares OCIO ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLSMCabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF-- -- -- -- OCIOClearShares OCIO ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
