CLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of -2.33%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Drilling Tools International Corp. (US)'s return on equity of -5.19%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 110.14%. On the other hand Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) has an analysts' consensus of $3.63 which suggests that it could grow by 29%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Drilling Tools International Corp. (US), analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Drilling Tools International Corp. (US).

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are larger than Drilling Tools International Corp. (US) quarterly revenues of $38.8M. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Drilling Tools International Corp. (US)'s net income of -$904K. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Drilling Tools International Corp. (US)'s PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.13x versus 0.62x for Drilling Tools International Corp. (US). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geospace Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of -29.51%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Geospace Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -7.25%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 110.14%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies Corp., analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Geospace Technologies Corp..

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies Corp. has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.161%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Geospace Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are larger than Geospace Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.7M. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Geospace Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$9.1M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Geospace Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.13x versus 1.95x for Geospace Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 15.56%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -11.98%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 110.14%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.52%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Icahn Enterprises LP, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Icahn Enterprises LP.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.351%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 27.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out 72.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of $411M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.13x versus 0.40x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 5.6%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 110.14%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $200.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.59%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.13x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.