CLNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVR Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 20.63%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat CVR Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.13%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 100.3%. On the other hand CVR Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could fall by -18.77%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, Inc., analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than CVR Energy, Inc..

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.563%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVR Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy, Inc. pays out 2155.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than CVR Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than CVR Energy, Inc.'s net income of $401M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVR Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.23x versus 0.47x for CVR Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 15.56%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -11.98%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 100.3%. On the other hand Icahn Enterprises LP has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.88%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Icahn Enterprises LP, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Icahn Enterprises LP.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.351%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Icahn Enterprises LP offers a yield of 24.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP pays out 72.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Icahn Enterprises LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of $411M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Icahn Enterprises LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.23x versus 0.45x for Icahn Enterprises LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 5.6%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of 19.43%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 100.3%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $201.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.88%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum Corp..

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.912%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marathon Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp. pays out 33.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $34.6B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marathon Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.23x versus 0.45x for Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -22.55% compared to Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net margin of 0.48%. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s return on equity of -32.35% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 5.65%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.71, signalling upside risk potential of 100.3%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $149.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.62%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a beta of 2.283, which suggesting that the stock is 128.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.693%.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 90.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Energy Fuels Corp. quarterly revenues are $106.5M, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $34.5B. Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s net income of -$24M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $165M. Notably, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 38.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is 1.23x versus 0.43x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.