CLMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paid, Inc. has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net margin of 0.59%. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.45% beat Paid, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.52%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand Paid, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paid, Inc., analysts believe Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Paid, Inc..

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paid, Inc. has a beta of 0.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.578%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Paid, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions, Inc. pays 16.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paid, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues are $161.3M, which are larger than Paid, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Paid, Inc.'s net income of $32.2K. Notably, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.51x while Paid, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is 0.86x versus 1.14x for Paid, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net margin of 5.43%. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.45% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.22%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.75%. Given that ePlus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, Inc., analysts believe ePlus, Inc. is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions, Inc..

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69699999999999%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Climb Global Solutions, Inc. pays 16.73% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues are $161.3M, which are smaller than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $614.8M. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is lower than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $33.4M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.51x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is 0.86x versus 0.92x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tautachrome has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net margin of --. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.45% beat Tautachrome's return on equity of --.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand Tautachrome has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tautachrome, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Tautachrome.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tautachrome has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Tautachrome offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions, Inc. pays 16.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Tautachrome pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues are $161.3M, which are larger than Tautachrome quarterly revenues of --. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Tautachrome's net income of --. Notably, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.51x while Tautachrome's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is 0.86x versus -- for Tautachrome. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software, Inc. has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.45% beat Upland Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a consensus price target of $133.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.24%. On the other hand Upland Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 320.71%. Given that Upland Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Upland Software, Inc. is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions, Inc..

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.153, which suggesting that the stock is 15.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software, Inc. has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.673%.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.57%. Upland Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions, Inc. pays 16.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues are $161.3M, which are larger than Upland Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $4.6M is higher than Upland Software, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.51x while Upland Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions, Inc. is 0.86x versus 0.12x for Upland Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.