CLMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 11.84%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.20 which suggests that it could grow by 12.98%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.467%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 105.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.94x versus 15.46x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 4.72%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.6%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than ePlus.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.94x versus 0.80x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 15.63%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.76%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than Red Violet.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 73.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.94x versus 8.14x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of -5.04%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 22.74% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of $136.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 79.33%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 16.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $138M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $3.7M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.13x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 0.94x versus 0.24x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.