CLMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 16.4%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 21.83% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $202.65 which suggests that it could grow by 17.26%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.925%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 24.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $5.5M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.69x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 45.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 1.35x versus 14.81x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 6.08%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 21.83% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.86%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 24.44% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $5.5M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.69x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 1.35x versus 0.96x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of 9.02%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 21.83% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.88%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Climb Global Solutions, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Climb Global Solutions.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.283%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 24.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $5.5M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.69x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 98.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 1.35x versus 7.05x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 4.57% compared to Climb Global Solutions's net margin of -2.6%. Climb Global Solutions's return on equity of 21.83% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Climb Global Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -33.12%. Given that Climb Global Solutions has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Climb Global Solutions is more attractive than Upland Software.

Climb Global Solutions has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.256% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

Climb Global Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.55%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Climb Global Solutions pays 24.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Climb Global Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Climb Global Solutions quarterly revenues are $119.3M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Climb Global Solutions's net income of $5.5M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Climb Global Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.69x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Climb Global Solutions is 1.35x versus 0.47x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.