CDLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lendway, Inc. has a net margin of -139.67% compared to Cardlytics, Inc.'s net margin of -65.3%. Cardlytics, Inc.'s return on equity of -214.96% beat Lendway, Inc.'s return on equity of -36.24%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.37%. On the other hand Lendway, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cardlytics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lendway, Inc., analysts believe Cardlytics, Inc. is more attractive than Lendway, Inc..

Cardlytics, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway, Inc. has a beta of 2.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.333%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52M, which are larger than Lendway, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Cardlytics, Inc.'s net income of -$72.7M is lower than Lendway, Inc.'s net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Cardlytics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.13x for Lendway, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite, Inc. has a net margin of -139.67% compared to Cardlytics, Inc.'s net margin of 11.18%. Cardlytics, Inc.'s return on equity of -214.96% beat Magnite, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.6%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.37%. On the other hand Magnite, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $26.86 which suggests that it could grow by 66.09%. Given that Magnite, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cardlytics, Inc., analysts believe Magnite, Inc. is more attractive than Cardlytics, Inc..

Cardlytics, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite, Inc. has a beta of 2.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.308%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Magnite, Inc. quarterly revenues of $179.5M. Cardlytics, Inc.'s net income of -$72.7M is lower than Magnite, Inc.'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, Cardlytics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics, Inc. is 0.28x versus 3.43x for Magnite, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stagwell, Inc. has a net margin of -139.67% compared to Cardlytics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.21%. Cardlytics, Inc.'s return on equity of -214.96% beat Stagwell, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.8%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.37%. On the other hand Stagwell, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could grow by 57.14%. Given that Stagwell, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cardlytics, Inc., analysts believe Stagwell, Inc. is more attractive than Cardlytics, Inc..

Cardlytics, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stagwell, Inc. has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.029%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stagwell, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stagwell, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Stagwell, Inc. quarterly revenues of $740.4M. Cardlytics, Inc.'s net income of -$72.7M is lower than Stagwell, Inc.'s net income of $23.8M. Notably, Cardlytics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stagwell, Inc.'s PE ratio is 68.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.34x for Stagwell, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis, Inc. has a net margin of -139.67% compared to Cardlytics, Inc.'s net margin of -0.99%. Cardlytics, Inc.'s return on equity of -214.96% beat Ziff Davis, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.15%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.63, signalling upside risk potential of 20.37%. On the other hand Ziff Davis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 20.04%. Given that Cardlytics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ziff Davis, Inc., analysts believe Cardlytics, Inc. is more attractive than Ziff Davis, Inc..

Cardlytics, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, which suggesting that the stock is 5.131% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis, Inc. has a beta of 1.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.409%.

Cardlytics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cardlytics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cardlytics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $363.7M. Cardlytics, Inc.'s net income of -$72.7M is lower than Ziff Davis, Inc.'s net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Cardlytics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cardlytics, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.08x for Ziff Davis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.