CCLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to CareCloud, Inc.'s net margin of -86.61%. CareCloud, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.47% beat Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity of -49.15%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.31, signalling upside risk potential of 88.43%. On the other hand Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CareCloud, Inc. has higher upside potential than Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc., analysts believe CareCloud, Inc. is more attractive than Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc..

CareCloud, Inc. has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.902%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CareCloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CareCloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are larger than Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CareCloud, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M. Notably, CareCloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.97x while Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CareCloud, Inc. is 0.97x versus 0.00x for Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to CareCloud, Inc.'s net margin of 14.85%. CareCloud, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.47% beat Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.16%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.31, signalling upside risk potential of 88.43%. On the other hand Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CareCloud, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc., analysts believe CareCloud, Inc. is more attractive than Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc..

CareCloud, Inc. has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.321%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. offers a yield of 6.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CareCloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CareCloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are larger than Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6M. CareCloud, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc.'s net income of $235.1K. Notably, CareCloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.97x while Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CareCloud, Inc. is 0.97x versus 2.19x for Pacific Health Care Organization, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phreesia, Inc. has a net margin of 8.39% compared to CareCloud, Inc.'s net margin of 1.02%. CareCloud, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.47% beat Phreesia, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.77%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.31, signalling upside risk potential of 88.43%. On the other hand Phreesia, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.94 which suggests that it could grow by 127.67%. Given that Phreesia, Inc. has higher upside potential than CareCloud, Inc., analysts believe Phreesia, Inc. is more attractive than CareCloud, Inc..

CareCloud, Inc. has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phreesia, Inc. has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.427%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Phreesia, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CareCloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phreesia, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CareCloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are smaller than Phreesia, Inc. quarterly revenues of $127.1M. CareCloud, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Phreesia, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, CareCloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.97x while Phreesia, Inc.'s PE ratio is 241.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CareCloud, Inc. is 0.97x versus 1.06x for Phreesia, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WW International has a net margin of 8.39% compared to CareCloud, Inc.'s net margin of -38.91%. CareCloud, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.47% beat WW International's return on equity of --.

CareCloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.31, signalling upside risk potential of 88.43%. On the other hand WW International has an analysts' consensus of $1.10 which suggests that it could grow by 340.71%. Given that WW International has higher upside potential than CareCloud, Inc., analysts believe WW International is more attractive than CareCloud, Inc..

CareCloud, Inc. has a beta of 1.829, which suggesting that the stock is 82.876% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WW International has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.755%.

CareCloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WW International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CareCloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WW International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CareCloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are $34.4M, which are smaller than WW International quarterly revenues of $186.6M. CareCloud, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than WW International's net income of -$72.6M. Notably, CareCloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.97x while WW International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CareCloud, Inc. is 0.97x versus 0.03x for WW International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.