BEAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FOXO Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to HeartBeam's net margin of -162.71%. HeartBeam's return on equity of -- beat FOXO Technologies's return on equity of --.

HeartBeam has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 123.21%. On the other hand FOXO Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that HeartBeam has higher upside potential than FOXO Technologies, analysts believe HeartBeam is more attractive than FOXO Technologies.

HeartBeam has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FOXO Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HeartBeam has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FOXO Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HeartBeam pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FOXO Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HeartBeam quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FOXO Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.2M. HeartBeam's net income of -$5M is lower than FOXO Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, HeartBeam's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FOXO Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeartBeam is -- versus 2.30x for FOXO Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ontrak has a net margin of -- compared to HeartBeam's net margin of -217.21%. HeartBeam's return on equity of -- beat Ontrak's return on equity of -231.34%.

HeartBeam has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 123.21%. On the other hand Ontrak has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 117.39%. Given that HeartBeam has higher upside potential than Ontrak, analysts believe HeartBeam is more attractive than Ontrak.

HeartBeam has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ontrak has a beta of 2.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.002%.

HeartBeam has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ontrak offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HeartBeam pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ontrak pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HeartBeam quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ontrak quarterly revenues of $2.6M. HeartBeam's net income of -$5M is higher than Ontrak's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, HeartBeam's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ontrak's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeartBeam is -- versus 0.63x for Ontrak. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spok Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to HeartBeam's net margin of 10.5%. HeartBeam's return on equity of -- beat Spok Holdings's return on equity of 9.13%.

HeartBeam has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 123.21%. On the other hand Spok Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -6.43%. Given that HeartBeam has higher upside potential than Spok Holdings, analysts believe HeartBeam is more attractive than Spok Holdings.

HeartBeam has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spok Holdings has a beta of 0.342, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.754%.

HeartBeam has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spok Holdings offers a yield of 7.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. HeartBeam pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spok Holdings pays out 163.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

HeartBeam quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Spok Holdings quarterly revenues of $34.9M. HeartBeam's net income of -$5M is lower than Spok Holdings's net income of $3.7M. Notably, HeartBeam's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spok Holdings's PE ratio is 21.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HeartBeam is -- versus 2.38x for Spok Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.