ANPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hang Feng Technology Innovation has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Hang Feng Technology Innovation's return on equity of --.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hang Feng Technology Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hang Feng Technology Innovation, analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Hang Feng Technology Innovation.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hang Feng Technology Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hang Feng Technology Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hang Feng Technology Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hang Feng Technology Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hang Feng Technology Innovation's net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,850.00x while Hang Feng Technology Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 257.83x versus -- for Hang Feng Technology Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 3.03%. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.78%.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -32.66%. Given that Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. is more attractive than Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd..

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.695%.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. quarterly revenues of $51.5M. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,850.00x while Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 257.83x versus 1.17x for Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Senstar Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 12.06%. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Senstar Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of 11.81%.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senstar Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Senstar Technologies Corp., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Senstar Technologies Corp..

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senstar Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.072%.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senstar Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senstar Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Senstar Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Senstar Technologies Corp.'s net income of $1M. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,850.00x while Senstar Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 257.83x versus 2.27x for Senstar Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.