Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
52
ANPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.25
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$21.25 - $22.25
52-week range:
$2.80 - $54.75
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
2,647.62x
P/S ratio:
368.99x
P/B ratio:
195.64x
Volume:
16.1K
Avg. volume:
13.8K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$278M
Revenue:
$753.2K
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
$22.24 | -- | $278M | 2,647.62x | $0.00 | 0% | 368.99x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.37 | -- | $9.2M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.24 | -- | $9.4M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.40 | -- | $6.4M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 1.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
FOFO
Hang Feng Technology Innovation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or CIIT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or CIIT More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or CIIT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or CIIT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2,647.62x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 368.99x versus 0.58x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.368.99x 2,647.62x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.58x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or CLWT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or CLWT More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or CLWT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or CLWT?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2,647.62x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 368.99x versus 0.62x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.368.99x 2,647.62x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.62x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or FOFO?
Hang Feng Technology Innovation has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Hang Feng Technology Innovation's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- FOFOHang Feng Technology Innovation-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or FOFO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hang Feng Technology Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hang Feng Technology Innovation, analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Hang Feng Technology Innovation.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 FOFOHang Feng Technology Innovation0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or FOFO More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hang Feng Technology Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or FOFO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hang Feng Technology Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hang Feng Technology Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or FOFO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hang Feng Technology Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hang Feng Technology Innovation's net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2,647.62x while Hang Feng Technology Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 368.99x versus -- for Hang Feng Technology Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.368.99x 2,647.62x -- -- FOFOHang Feng Technology Innovation-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or HIHO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or HIHO More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or HIHO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or HIHO?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2,647.62x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 368.99x versus 1.02x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.368.99x 2,647.62x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.02x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
