Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
42
ANPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$63.02
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$64.05 - $75.12
52-week range:
$2.80 - $180.64
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
52,364.29x
P/S ratio:
1,144.18x
P/B ratio:
195.64x
Volume:
98K
Avg. volume:
212.6K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$916.4M
Revenue:
$801.7K
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
$73.31 | -- | $916.4M | 52,364.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 1,144.18x |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$1.69 | -- | $266.3M | 88.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.40x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
$2.46 | -- | $6M | 11.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.07x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
$0.92 | -- | $46.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
0.83% | -0.989 | 0.02% | 0.89x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-42.14% | 1.065 | -- | 0.40x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
69.75% | -0.556 | -- | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ANPA
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$312K | $20.8K | 15.18% | 15.6% | 2.68% | -$13.5K |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.67% | -103.07% | -- | -- |
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or CRE?
Cre8 Enterprise has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Cre8 Enterprise's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- CRECre8 Enterprise-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or CRE?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cre8 Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cre8 Enterprise, analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Cre8 Enterprise.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CRECre8 Enterprise0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or CRE More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cre8 Enterprise has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or CRE?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cre8 Enterprise offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cre8 Enterprise pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or CRE?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cre8 Enterprise quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Cre8 Enterprise's net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52,364.29x while Cre8 Enterprise's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 1,144.18x versus -- for Cre8 Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.1,144.18x 52,364.29x -- -- CRECre8 Enterprise-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or KUBR?
Kuber Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 1.25%. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Kuber Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- KUBRKuber Resources Corp.40.25% $0.00 $25M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or KUBR?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuber Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kuber Resources Corp., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Kuber Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KUBRKuber Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or KUBR More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuber Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.271%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or KUBR?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuber Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kuber Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or KUBR?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuber Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $775.2K. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kuber Resources Corp.'s net income of $9.7K. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52,364.29x while Kuber Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 88.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 1,144.18x versus 21.40x for Kuber Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.1,144.18x 52,364.29x -- -- KUBRKuber Resources Corp.21.40x 88.95x $775.2K $9.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or PMAX?
Powell Max Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Powell Max Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- PMAXPowell Max Ltd.-- -- -$1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or PMAX?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Powell Max Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Powell Max Ltd., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Powell Max Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or PMAX More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Max Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or PMAX?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Powell Max Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Max Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or PMAX?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Powell Max Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Powell Max Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52,364.29x while Powell Max Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 1,144.18x versus 1.07x for Powell Max Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.1,144.18x 52,364.29x -- -- PMAXPowell Max Ltd.1.07x 11.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or SFHG?
Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Samfine Creation Holdings Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or SFHG?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samfine Creation Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Samfine Creation Holdings Group, analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Samfine Creation Holdings Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or SFHG More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or SFHG?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samfine Creation Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samfine Creation Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or SFHG?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Samfine Creation Holdings Group quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Samfine Creation Holdings Group's net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52,364.29x while Samfine Creation Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 1,144.18x versus -- for Samfine Creation Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.1,144.18x 52,364.29x -- -- SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ANPA or USPCY?
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -103.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.-- -- $89.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ANPA or USPCY?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd., analysts believe Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ANPA or USPCY More Risky?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ANPA or USPCY?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ANPA or USPCY?
Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52,364.29x while China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rich Sparkle Holdings Ltd. is 1,144.18x versus 0.90x for China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ANPARich Sparkle Holdings Ltd.1,144.18x 52,364.29x -- -- USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0.90x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
