OPGN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -5629.82% compared to 's net margin of -427991.3%. 's return on equity of 89.47% beat Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that has higher upside potential than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe is more attractive than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc..

has a beta of -3,221.492, which suggesting that the stock is 322249.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.693, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.348%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. 's net income of -$608.7K is lower than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $31.3K. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.89x while Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 27.78x versus 58,635.39x for Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. has a net margin of -5629.82% compared to 's net margin of --. 's return on equity of 89.47% beat Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24999900%. Given that Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. has higher upside potential than , analysts believe Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. is more attractive than .

has a beta of -3,221.492, which suggesting that the stock is 322249.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. has a beta of 9.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 843.464%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. 's net income of -$608.7K is lower than Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.'s net income of -$158K. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.89x while Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 27.78x versus -- for Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

QHSLab, Inc. has a net margin of -5629.82% compared to 's net margin of 4.53%. 's return on equity of 89.47% beat QHSLab, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand QHSLab, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that has higher upside potential than QHSLab, Inc., analysts believe is more attractive than QHSLab, Inc..

has a beta of -3,221.492, which suggesting that the stock is 322249.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QHSLab, Inc. has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.351%.

has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. QHSLab, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. QHSLab, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than QHSLab, Inc. quarterly revenues of $737.1K. 's net income of -$608.7K is lower than QHSLab, Inc.'s net income of $33.4K. Notably, 's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.89x while QHSLab, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for is 27.78x versus 3.70x for QHSLab, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.