URB.A.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a net margin of 86.84% compared to Urbana's net margin of -13780.74%. Urbana's return on equity of 17.17% beat Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2%.

Urbana has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urbana has higher upside potential than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings, analysts believe Urbana is more attractive than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings.

Urbana has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urbana has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urbana pays 6.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana quarterly revenues are $27.5M, which are larger than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues of -$14.7K. Urbana's net income of $23.9M is higher than Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Urbana's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.55x while Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana is 3.12x versus 18.92x for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GOAT Industries has a net margin of 86.84% compared to Urbana's net margin of --. Urbana's return on equity of 17.17% beat GOAT Industries's return on equity of --.

Urbana has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GOAT Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urbana has higher upside potential than GOAT Industries, analysts believe Urbana is more attractive than GOAT Industries.

Urbana has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GOAT Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urbana has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. GOAT Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urbana pays 6.55% of its earnings as a dividend. GOAT Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana quarterly revenues are $27.5M, which are larger than GOAT Industries quarterly revenues of --. Urbana's net income of $23.9M is higher than GOAT Industries's net income of -$254.2K. Notably, Urbana's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.55x while GOAT Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana is 3.12x versus -- for GOAT Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris Northstar Capital has a net margin of 86.84% compared to Urbana's net margin of --. Urbana's return on equity of 17.17% beat Polaris Northstar Capital's return on equity of --.

Urbana has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris Northstar Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urbana has higher upside potential than Polaris Northstar Capital, analysts believe Urbana is more attractive than Polaris Northstar Capital.

Urbana has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris Northstar Capital has a beta of 8.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 729.945%.

Urbana has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Polaris Northstar Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urbana pays 6.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris Northstar Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana quarterly revenues are $27.5M, which are larger than Polaris Northstar Capital quarterly revenues of --. Urbana's net income of $23.9M is higher than Polaris Northstar Capital's net income of --. Notably, Urbana's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.55x while Polaris Northstar Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana is 3.12x versus -- for Polaris Northstar Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SOL Global Investments has a net margin of 86.84% compared to Urbana's net margin of 83.88%. Urbana's return on equity of 17.17% beat SOL Global Investments's return on equity of -251.4%.

Urbana has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SOL Global Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urbana has higher upside potential than SOL Global Investments, analysts believe Urbana is more attractive than SOL Global Investments.

Urbana has a beta of 0.006, which suggesting that the stock is 99.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SOL Global Investments has a beta of 2.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.596%.

Urbana has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. SOL Global Investments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urbana pays 6.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SOL Global Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana quarterly revenues are $27.5M, which are larger than SOL Global Investments quarterly revenues of -$3.6M. Urbana's net income of $23.9M is higher than SOL Global Investments's net income of -$3M. Notably, Urbana's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.55x while SOL Global Investments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana is 3.12x versus -- for SOL Global Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.