Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
29
NUE.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.34
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$0.34 - $0.39
52-week range:
$0.29 - $1.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
16.68x
P/B ratio:
128.62x
Volume:
99K
Avg. volume:
126.4K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$10.4M
Revenue:
$401.4K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.27
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NUE.CX
NU E Power
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$711.6M | $0.75 | -17.91% | 3.53% | $65.45 |
|
MXG.TO
Maxim Power
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRME.CX
Prime Drink Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$421.8M | $0.08 | -8.73% | -84.58% | $18.38 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NUE.CX
NU E Power
|
$0.34 | -- | $10.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 16.68x |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
$0.0400 | -- | $416.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$62.05 | $65.45 | $8.1B | 15.02x | $0.65 | 4.08% | 2.06x |
|
MXG.TO
Maxim Power
|
$6.00 | -- | $381.8M | 8.70x | $0.50 | 0% | 3.30x |
|
PRME.CX
Prime Drink Group
|
$0.22 | -- | $72.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$19.54 | $18.38 | $5.8B | 54.28x | $0.06 | 1.23% | 2.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NUE.CX
NU E Power
|
78.84% | 0.000 | 2.46% | 0.57x |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | 0.357 | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
56.92% | 1.076 | 78.08% | 0.61x |
|
MXG.TO
Maxim Power
|
20.01% | 1.354 | 40.92% | 4.88x |
|
PRME.CX
Prime Drink Group
|
-- | 5.059 | -- | -- |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
69.67% | -0.466 | 79.94% | 0.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NUE.CX
NU E Power
|
-- | -$415K | -1610.21% | -3783.59% | -407.74% | -$852.6K |
|
BKS.CX
Berkley Renewables
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPX.TO
Capital Power
|
$574M | $294M | 6.8% | 15.57% | 28.74% | $5M |
|
MXG.TO
Maxim Power
|
-- | $6.4M | 10.9% | 13.81% | 60.36% | $10.9M |
|
PRME.CX
Prime Drink Group
|
-- | -$389.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$634.1K |
|
TA.TO
TransAlta
|
$384M | $99M | 3.41% | 10.36% | 11.6% | $152M |
NU E Power vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NUE.CX or BKS.CX?
Berkley Renewables has a net margin of -416.52% compared to NU E Power's net margin of --. NU E Power's return on equity of -3783.59% beat Berkley Renewables's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NUE.CXNU E Power-- -$0.01 $380.5K BKS.CXBerkley Renewables-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NUE.CX or BKS.CX?
NU E Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Berkley Renewables has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NU E Power has higher upside potential than Berkley Renewables, analysts believe NU E Power is more attractive than Berkley Renewables.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NUE.CXNU E Power0 0 0 BKS.CXBerkley Renewables0 0 0 -
Is NUE.CX or BKS.CX More Risky?
NU E Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berkley Renewables has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.362%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUE.CX or BKS.CX?
NU E Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Berkley Renewables offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NU E Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berkley Renewables pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NUE.CX or BKS.CX?
NU E Power quarterly revenues are $104K, which are larger than Berkley Renewables quarterly revenues of --. NU E Power's net income of -$433.2K is higher than Berkley Renewables's net income of --. Notably, NU E Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Berkley Renewables's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NU E Power is 16.68x versus 0.20x for Berkley Renewables. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NUE.CXNU E Power16.68x -- $104K -$433.2K BKS.CXBerkley Renewables0.20x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NUE.CX or CPX.TO?
Capital Power has a net margin of -416.52% compared to NU E Power's net margin of 17.38%. NU E Power's return on equity of -3783.59% beat Capital Power's return on equity of 15.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NUE.CXNU E Power-- -$0.01 $380.5K CPX.TOCapital Power55.73% $1.32 $8.8B -
What do Analysts Say About NUE.CX or CPX.TO?
NU E Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Power has an analysts' consensus of $65.45 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Capital Power has higher upside potential than NU E Power, analysts believe Capital Power is more attractive than NU E Power.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NUE.CXNU E Power0 0 0 CPX.TOCapital Power3 4 0 -
Is NUE.CX or CPX.TO More Risky?
NU E Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Power has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUE.CX or CPX.TO?
NU E Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capital Power offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. NU E Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Power pays out 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NUE.CX or CPX.TO?
NU E Power quarterly revenues are $104K, which are smaller than Capital Power quarterly revenues of $1B. NU E Power's net income of -$433.2K is lower than Capital Power's net income of $179M. Notably, NU E Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Power's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NU E Power is 16.68x versus 2.06x for Capital Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NUE.CXNU E Power16.68x -- $104K -$433.2K CPX.TOCapital Power2.06x 15.02x $1B $179M
-
Which has Higher Returns NUE.CX or MXG.TO?
Maxim Power has a net margin of -416.52% compared to NU E Power's net margin of 41.87%. NU E Power's return on equity of -3783.59% beat Maxim Power's return on equity of 13.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NUE.CXNU E Power-- -$0.01 $380.5K MXG.TOMaxim Power-- $0.18 $399.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NUE.CX or MXG.TO?
NU E Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maxim Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -33.33%. Given that Maxim Power has higher upside potential than NU E Power, analysts believe Maxim Power is more attractive than NU E Power.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NUE.CXNU E Power0 0 0 MXG.TOMaxim Power0 0 0 -
Is NUE.CX or MXG.TO More Risky?
NU E Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maxim Power has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.318%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUE.CX or MXG.TO?
NU E Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maxim Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. NU E Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maxim Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NUE.CX or MXG.TO?
NU E Power quarterly revenues are $104K, which are smaller than Maxim Power quarterly revenues of $25.7M. NU E Power's net income of -$433.2K is lower than Maxim Power's net income of $10.7M. Notably, NU E Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Maxim Power's PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NU E Power is 16.68x versus 3.30x for Maxim Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NUE.CXNU E Power16.68x -- $104K -$433.2K MXG.TOMaxim Power3.30x 8.70x $25.7M $10.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NUE.CX or PRME.CX?
Prime Drink Group has a net margin of -416.52% compared to NU E Power's net margin of --. NU E Power's return on equity of -3783.59% beat Prime Drink Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NUE.CXNU E Power-- -$0.01 $380.5K PRME.CXPrime Drink Group-- -$0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About NUE.CX or PRME.CX?
NU E Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prime Drink Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NU E Power has higher upside potential than Prime Drink Group, analysts believe NU E Power is more attractive than Prime Drink Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NUE.CXNU E Power0 0 0 PRME.CXPrime Drink Group0 0 0 -
Is NUE.CX or PRME.CX More Risky?
NU E Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prime Drink Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUE.CX or PRME.CX?
NU E Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prime Drink Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NU E Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prime Drink Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NUE.CX or PRME.CX?
NU E Power quarterly revenues are $104K, which are larger than Prime Drink Group quarterly revenues of --. NU E Power's net income of -$433.2K is lower than Prime Drink Group's net income of -$302.2K. Notably, NU E Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prime Drink Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NU E Power is 16.68x versus -- for Prime Drink Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NUE.CXNU E Power16.68x -- $104K -$433.2K PRME.CXPrime Drink Group-- -- -- -$302.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns NUE.CX or TA.TO?
TransAlta has a net margin of -416.52% compared to NU E Power's net margin of -3.61%. NU E Power's return on equity of -3783.59% beat TransAlta's return on equity of 10.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NUE.CXNU E Power-- -$0.01 $380.5K TA.TOTransAlta60.19% -$0.12 $6.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NUE.CX or TA.TO?
NU E Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TransAlta has an analysts' consensus of $18.38 which suggests that it could fall by -5.96%. Given that TransAlta has higher upside potential than NU E Power, analysts believe TransAlta is more attractive than NU E Power.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NUE.CXNU E Power0 0 0 TA.TOTransAlta3 2 0 -
Is NUE.CX or TA.TO More Risky?
NU E Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransAlta has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.044%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NUE.CX or TA.TO?
NU E Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransAlta offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. NU E Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransAlta pays out 15.68% of its earnings as a dividend. TransAlta's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NUE.CX or TA.TO?
NU E Power quarterly revenues are $104K, which are smaller than TransAlta quarterly revenues of $638M. NU E Power's net income of -$433.2K is higher than TransAlta's net income of -$23M. Notably, NU E Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TransAlta's PE ratio is 54.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NU E Power is 16.68x versus 2.13x for TransAlta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NUE.CXNU E Power16.68x -- $104K -$433.2K TA.TOTransAlta2.13x 54.28x $638M -$23M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.16% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 3.67% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.52% over the past day.
