Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
79
EATS.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.16
Seasonality move
:
8.33%
Day range:
$0.15 - $0.16
52-week range:
$0.02 - $0.30
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
18.92x
P/B ratio:
1.08x
Volume:
9.9K
Avg. volume:
267.2K
1-year change:
68.42%
Market cap:
$4.7M
Revenue:
$4.6K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.15
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
|
$0.16 | -- | $4.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.92x |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
|
$0.04 | -- | $6.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
|
$0.13 | -- | $888.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.01x |
|
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
|
$0.33 | -- | $2.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
|
$0.04 | -- | $2.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
|
$0.39 | -- | $21M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
|
-- | 9.841 | -- | 0.03x |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
|
0.37% | -0.198 | 0.48% | 0.22x |
|
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
|
-- | 13.536 | -- | 0.89x |
|
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
|
-- | -6.354 | -- | -- |
|
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
|
85.5% | 13.006 | 1066.57% | 0.09x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EATS.CX
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings
|
-$351.1K | -$80.6K | -534.2% | -534.2% | 547.62% | -$2.2K |
|
AAB.TO
Aberdeen International
|
-- | -- | -51.11% | -51.29% | 81.44% | $22.6K |
|
CLDV.CX
Cloud3 Ventures
|
-$15.9K | -$398.5K | -82.06% | -89.68% | -933.77% | -$92.5K |
|
GOAT.CX
GOAT Industries
|
-- | -$254.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$243.6K |
|
POLE.CX
Polaris Northstar Capital
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOL.CX
SOL Global Investments
|
-- | -- | -56.54% | -251.4% | 58.89% | $3.4M |
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or AAB.TO?
Aberdeen International has a net margin of -13780.74% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of 81.41%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Aberdeen International's return on equity of -51.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings-- -$0.00 -$928.1K AAB.TOAberdeen International-- $0.01 $11.2M -
What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or AAB.TO?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aberdeen International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Aberdeen International, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Aberdeen International.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings0 0 0 AAB.TOAberdeen International0 0 0 -
Is EATS.CX or AAB.TO More Risky?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aberdeen International has a beta of 1.758, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or AAB.TO?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aberdeen International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aberdeen International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or AAB.TO?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are smaller than Aberdeen International quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is lower than Aberdeen International's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aberdeen International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 18.92x versus -- for Aberdeen International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings18.92x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K AAB.TOAberdeen International-- -- $1.9M $1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?
Cloud3 Ventures has a net margin of -13780.74% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of -933.77%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Cloud3 Ventures's return on equity of -89.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings-- -$0.00 -$928.1K CLDV.CXCloud3 Ventures-32.39% -$0.05 $4M -
What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cloud3 Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Cloud3 Ventures, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Cloud3 Ventures.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings0 0 0 CLDV.CXCloud3 Ventures0 0 0 -
Is EATS.CX or CLDV.CX More Risky?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloud3 Ventures has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloud3 Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloud3 Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or CLDV.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are smaller than Cloud3 Ventures quarterly revenues of $49K. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than Cloud3 Ventures's net income of -$457.2K. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloud3 Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 18.92x versus 8.01x for Cloud3 Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings18.92x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K CLDV.CXCloud3 Ventures8.01x -- $49K -$457.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?
GOAT Industries has a net margin of -13780.74% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat GOAT Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings-- -$0.00 -$928.1K GOAT.CXGOAT Industries-- -$0.04 -- -
What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GOAT Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than GOAT Industries, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than GOAT Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings0 0 0 GOAT.CXGOAT Industries0 0 0 -
Is EATS.CX or GOAT.CX More Risky?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GOAT Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GOAT Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GOAT Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or GOAT.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than GOAT Industries quarterly revenues of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than GOAT Industries's net income of -$254.2K. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GOAT Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 18.92x versus -- for GOAT Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings18.92x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K GOAT.CXGOAT Industries-- -- -- -$254.2K
-
Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or POLE.CX?
Polaris Northstar Capital has a net margin of -13780.74% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat Polaris Northstar Capital's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings-- -$0.00 -$928.1K POLE.CXPolaris Northstar Capital-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or POLE.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris Northstar Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Polaris Northstar Capital, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than Polaris Northstar Capital.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings0 0 0 POLE.CXPolaris Northstar Capital0 0 0 -
Is EATS.CX or POLE.CX More Risky?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris Northstar Capital has a beta of 8.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 729.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or POLE.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris Northstar Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris Northstar Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or POLE.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than Polaris Northstar Capital quarterly revenues of --. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than Polaris Northstar Capital's net income of --. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polaris Northstar Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 18.92x versus -- for Polaris Northstar Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings18.92x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K POLE.CXPolaris Northstar Capital-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EATS.CX or SOL.CX?
SOL Global Investments has a net margin of -13780.74% compared to Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net margin of 83.88%. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's return on equity of -534.2% beat SOL Global Investments's return on equity of -251.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings-- -$0.00 -$928.1K SOL.CXSOL Global Investments-- -$0.05 $34M -
What do Analysts Say About EATS.CX or SOL.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SOL Global Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has higher upside potential than SOL Global Investments, analysts believe Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is more attractive than SOL Global Investments.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings0 0 0 SOL.CXSOL Global Investments0 0 0 -
Is EATS.CX or SOL.CX More Risky?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SOL Global Investments has a beta of 2.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.596%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EATS.CX or SOL.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SOL Global Investments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SOL Global Investments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EATS.CX or SOL.CX?
Eat & Beyond Global Holdings quarterly revenues are -$14.7K, which are larger than SOL Global Investments quarterly revenues of -$3.6M. Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's net income of -$81.3K is higher than SOL Global Investments's net income of -$3M. Notably, Eat & Beyond Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SOL Global Investments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eat & Beyond Global Holdings is 18.92x versus -- for SOL Global Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EATS.CXEat & Beyond Global Holdings18.92x -- -$14.7K -$81.3K SOL.CXSOL Global Investments-- -- -$3.6M -$3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
