DPRO.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Republic Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -239.79% compared to Draganfly, Inc.'s net margin of --. Draganfly, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.02% beat Republic Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -1749.63%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.19, signalling upside risk potential of 664.39%. On the other hand Republic Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Draganfly, Inc. has higher upside potential than Republic Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Draganfly, Inc. is more attractive than Republic Technologies, Inc..

Draganfly, Inc. has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.257%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Draganfly, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Draganfly, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Republic Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Draganfly, Inc.'s net income of -$5.2M is lower than Republic Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $163.7K. Notably, Draganfly, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Draganfly, Inc. is 14.25x versus -- for Republic Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a net margin of -239.79% compared to Draganfly, Inc.'s net margin of -106.35%. Draganfly, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.02% beat Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of -1082.71%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.19, signalling upside risk potential of 664.39%. On the other hand Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Draganfly, Inc. has higher upside potential than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp., analysts believe Draganfly, Inc. is more attractive than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp..

Draganfly, Inc. has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. has a beta of 2.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.604%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Draganfly, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Draganfly, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $282.1K. Draganfly, Inc.'s net income of -$5.2M is lower than Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$300K. Notably, Draganfly, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Draganfly, Inc. is 14.25x versus 8.73x for Newlox Gold Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -239.79% compared to Draganfly, Inc.'s net margin of -88.58%. Draganfly, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.02% beat Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2612.73%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.19, signalling upside risk potential of 664.39%. On the other hand Sharc International Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Draganfly, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sharc International Systems, Inc., analysts believe Draganfly, Inc. is more attractive than Sharc International Systems, Inc..

Draganfly, Inc. has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sharc International Systems, Inc. has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.767%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sharc International Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Draganfly, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sharc International Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Draganfly, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Sharc International Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $829.9K. Draganfly, Inc.'s net income of -$5.2M is lower than Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$735.1K. Notably, Draganfly, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sharc International Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Draganfly, Inc. is 14.25x versus 4.52x for Sharc International Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a net margin of -239.79% compared to Draganfly, Inc.'s net margin of -15244.79%. Draganfly, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.02% beat Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Draganfly, Inc. has a consensus price target of $26.19, signalling upside risk potential of 664.39%. On the other hand Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Draganfly, Inc. has higher upside potential than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd., analysts believe Draganfly, Inc. is more attractive than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd..

Draganfly, Inc. has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.392% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.805%.

Draganfly, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Draganfly, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Draganfly, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Draganfly, Inc.'s net income of -$5.2M is lower than Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s net income of -$586.9K. Notably, Draganfly, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Draganfly, Inc. is 14.25x versus 193.61x for Star Navigation Systems Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.