AFX.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net margin of 25.53%. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -374.15% beat Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s return on equity of -167.71%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc., analysts believe Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is more attractive than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc..

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.573%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $81.9K. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$48.9K is lower than Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s net income of $20.9K. Notably, Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is -- versus 2.35x for Bee Vectoring Technologies International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net margin of -74.66%. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -374.15% beat Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -65.23%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 260%. Given that Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Arctic Fox Lithium Corp., analysts believe Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. is more attractive than Arctic Fox Lithium Corp..

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.18%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $2M. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$48.9K is higher than Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 151.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is -- versus 2.93x for Replenish Nutrients Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Organic Potash Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -374.15% beat Organic Potash Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Organic Potash Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than Organic Potash Corp., analysts believe Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is more attractive than Organic Potash Corp..

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Organic Potash Corp. has a beta of -0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.856%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Organic Potash Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Organic Potash Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Organic Potash Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$48.9K is lower than Organic Potash Corp.'s net income of -$23.7K. Notably, Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Organic Potash Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is -- versus -- for Organic Potash Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SureNano Science Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net margin of --. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s return on equity of -374.15% beat SureNano Science Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SureNano Science Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has higher upside potential than SureNano Science Ltd., analysts believe Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is more attractive than SureNano Science Ltd..

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SureNano Science Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SureNano Science Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SureNano Science Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SureNano Science Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s net income of -$48.9K is lower than SureNano Science Ltd.'s net income of -$35.5K. Notably, Arctic Fox Lithium Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SureNano Science Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arctic Fox Lithium Corp. is -- versus -- for SureNano Science Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.