AAWH.U.CX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

4Front Ventures Corp. has a net margin of -20.7% compared to Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -37.38%. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -176.7% beat 4Front Ventures Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 4Front Ventures Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2907.29%. Given that 4Front Ventures Corp. has higher upside potential than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc., analysts believe 4Front Ventures Corp. is more attractive than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc..

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 4Front Ventures Corp. has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.786%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 4Front Ventures Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 4Front Ventures Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than 4Front Ventures Corp. quarterly revenues of $23.4M. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$25.8M is lower than 4Front Ventures Corp.'s net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 4Front Ventures Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.04x for 4Front Ventures Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Thumb Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -20.7% compared to Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.17%. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -176.7% beat Green Thumb Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.53%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Green Thumb Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.51 which suggests that it could grow by 57.07%. Given that Green Thumb Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Green Thumb Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc..

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Thumb Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.713%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Green Thumb Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Green Thumb Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are smaller than Green Thumb Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $401.3M. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$25.8M is lower than Green Thumb Industries, Inc.'s net income of $32.8M. Notably, Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Green Thumb Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.63x for Green Thumb Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -20.7% compared to Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -188.89%. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -176.7% beat Planet 13 Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -80.9%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.25 which suggests that it could fall by -20.27%. Given that Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc..

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 2.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.773%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than Planet 13 Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32.1M. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$25.8M is higher than Planet 13 Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$60.5M. Notably, Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet 13 Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.66x for Planet 13 Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesana Health Holdings has a net margin of -20.7% compared to Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -176.7% beat Wesana Health Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wesana Health Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2383.25%. Given that Wesana Health Holdings has higher upside potential than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Wesana Health Holdings is more attractive than Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc..

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesana Health Holdings has a beta of -1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 200.004%.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wesana Health Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesana Health Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $124.7M, which are larger than Wesana Health Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$25.8M is higher than Wesana Health Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wesana Health Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ascend Wellness Holdings, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.39x for Wesana Health Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.