Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
64
PBP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.86
Seasonality move
:
-1.31%
Day range:
$22.84 - $22.89
52-week range:
$19.41 - $24.27
Dividend yield:
11.09%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
30.1K
Avg. volume:
53.6K
1-year change:
-3.62%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
|
$22.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.39 | 11.09% | -- |
|
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
|
$60.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.46% | -- |
|
CSM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
|
$80.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.02% | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
$30.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 6.39% | -- |
|
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
|
$40.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 10.48% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
|
-- | 0.434 | -- | -- |
|
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
|
-- | 1.667 | -- | -- |
|
CSM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
|
-- | 1.169 | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.904 | -- | -- |
|
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.428 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSM
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PBP or CLIX?
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- CLIXProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBP or CLIX?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is more attractive than ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF0 0 0 CLIXProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBP or CLIX More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBP or CLIX?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBP or CLIX?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- -- CLIXProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBP or CSM?
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Large Cap Core Plus's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- CSMProShares Large Cap Core Plus-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBP or CSM?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Large Cap Core Plus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Large Cap Core Plus, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is more attractive than ProShares Large Cap Core Plus.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF0 0 0 CSMProShares Large Cap Core Plus0 0 0 -
Is PBP or CSM More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Large Cap Core Plus has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.981%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBP or CSM?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. ProShares Large Cap Core Plus offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Large Cap Core Plus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBP or CSM?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Large Cap Core Plus quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Large Cap Core Plus's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Large Cap Core Plus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Large Cap Core Plus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- -- CSMProShares Large Cap Core Plus-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBP or QYLG?
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBP or QYLG?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is more attractive than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF0 0 0 QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBP or QYLG More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.371%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBP or QYLG?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBP or QYLG?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- -- QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBP or XYLD?
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- XYLDGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBP or XYLD?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF0 0 0 XYLDGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBP or XYLD More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a beta of 0.535, which suggesting that the stock is 46.504% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.299%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBP or XYLD?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.09%. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 10.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBP or XYLD?
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBPInvesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF-- -- -- -- XYLDGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
