Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
58
GDMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$38.99
Seasonality move
:
1.7%
Day range:
$38.83 - $39.00
52-week range:
$30.39 - $40.28
Dividend yield:
2.77%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
64.5K
Avg. volume:
9.8K
1-year change:
22.83%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONOF
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
$38.87 | -- | -- | -- | $1.08 | 2.77% | -- |
|
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
|
$38.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.52 | 1.36% | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
$36.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.65 | 1.81% | -- |
|
ONOF
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
|
$37.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.37% | -- |
|
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
|
$30.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.19% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | 0.596 | -- | -- |
|
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | 0.852 | -- | -- |
|
ONOF
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
|
-- | 1.263 | -- | -- |
|
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
|
-- | 0.672 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONOF
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or LCR?
Leuthold Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Leuthold Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- LCRLeuthold Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or LCR?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Leuthold Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Leuthold Core ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Leuthold Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 LCRLeuthold Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or LCR More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.117, which suggesting that the stock is 88.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leuthold Core ETF has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.74%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or LCR?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Leuthold Core ETF offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leuthold Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or LCR?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Leuthold Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Leuthold Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leuthold Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Leuthold Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- LCRLeuthold Core ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or LEXI?
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or LEXI More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.117, which suggesting that the stock is 88.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Alexis Practical Tactical ETF offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alexis Practical Tactical ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Alexis Practical Tactical ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or ONOF?
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- ONOFGlobal X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or ONOF?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 ONOFGlobal X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or ONOF More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.117, which suggesting that the stock is 88.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or ONOF?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or ONOF?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- ONOFGlobal X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or TACK?
Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- TACKFairlead Tactical Sector ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or TACK?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 TACKFairlead Tactical Sector ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or TACK More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.117, which suggesting that the stock is 88.317% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or TACK?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or TACK?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- TACKFairlead Tactical Sector ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 31
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 31
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
64
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is up 14.37% over the past day.
