Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Buy
72
GDMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.27
Seasonality move
:
2.2%
Day range:
$32.27 - $32.34
52-week range:
$30.31 - $33.29
Dividend yield:
2.27%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
44.1K
1-year change:
4.96%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
$32.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 2.27% | -- |
|
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF
|
$27.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.71% | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
$29.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.65 | 2.18% | -- |
|
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
|
$26.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 2.77% | -- |
|
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
|
$23.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 2.82% | -- |
|
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
|
$29.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | 0.426 | -- | -- |
|
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF
|
-- | 2.273 | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | 0.746 | -- | -- |
|
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
|
-- | 0.450 | -- | -- |
|
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
|
-- | 0.653 | -- | -- |
|
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.080 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMT
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LEXI
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLTG
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or HCMT?
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- HCMTDirexion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or HCMT?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 HCMTDirexion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or HCMT More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or HCMT?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or HCMT?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- HCMTDirexion HCM Tactical Enhanced US Equity Strat ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or LEXI?
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or LEXI More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alexis Practical Tactical ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Alexis Practical Tactical ETF offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alexis Practical Tactical ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or LEXI?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alexis Practical Tactical ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Alexis Practical Tactical ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- LEXIAlexis Practical Tactical ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or TBFC?
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- TBFCThe Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or TBFC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 TBFCThe Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or TBFC More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or TBFC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or TBFC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- TBFCThe Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or TDSC?
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- TDSCCabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or TDSC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 TDSCCabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or TDSC More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or TDSC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or TDSC?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- TDSCCabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GDMA or WLTG?
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net margin of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's return on equity of -- beat WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- WLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GDMA or WLTG?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has higher upside potential than WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF, analysts believe Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is more attractive than WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF0 0 0 WLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GDMA or WLTG More Risky?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a beta of 0.168, which suggesting that the stock is 83.231% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GDMA or WLTG?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GDMA or WLTG?
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's net income of -- is lower than WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF is -- versus -- for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GDMAGadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF-- -- -- -- WLTGWealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
From time to time, investors will run across the term…
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
