Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
65
AAAU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.93
Seasonality move
:
6.07%
Day range:
$25.83 - $26.02
52-week range:
$19.64 - $27.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.2M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
28.96%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
|
$25.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
|
$25.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
$27.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.96 | 0% | -- |
|
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
|
$242.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
|
$26.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
|
$15.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
|
-- | 0.327 | -- | -- |
|
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
|
-- | 0.328 | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | 1.063 | -- | -- |
|
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
|
-- | 0.324 | -- | -- |
|
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
|
-- | 1.601 | -- | -- |
|
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | 3.801 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AAAU or BAR?
GraniteShares Gold Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of -- beat GraniteShares Gold Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- BARGraniteShares Gold Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AAAU or BAR?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GraniteShares Gold Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has higher upside potential than GraniteShares Gold Trust, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is more attractive than GraniteShares Gold Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF0 0 0 BARGraniteShares Gold Trust0 0 0 -
Is AAAU or BAR More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, which suggesting that the stock is 86.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GraniteShares Gold Trust has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.894%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AAAU or BAR?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GraniteShares Gold Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GraniteShares Gold Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AAAU or BAR?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GraniteShares Gold Trust quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of -- is lower than GraniteShares Gold Trust's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GraniteShares Gold Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is -- versus -- for GraniteShares Gold Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- -- BARGraniteShares Gold Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AAAU or DBA?
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AAAU or DBA?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is more attractive than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF0 0 0 DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund0 0 0 -
Is AAAU or DBA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, which suggesting that the stock is 86.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.436%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AAAU or DBA?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AAAU or DBA?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- -- DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AAAU or GLD?
SPDR Gold Shares has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Gold Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- GLDSPDR Gold Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AAAU or GLD?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Gold Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Gold Shares, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is more attractive than SPDR Gold Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF0 0 0 GLDSPDR Gold Shares0 0 0 -
Is AAAU or GLD More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, which suggesting that the stock is 86.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Gold Shares has a beta of 0.133, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.706%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AAAU or GLD?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPDR Gold Shares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Gold Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AAAU or GLD?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Gold Shares quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Gold Shares's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Gold Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Gold Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- -- GLDSPDR Gold Shares-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AAAU or SLV?
iShares Silver Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Silver Trust's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- SLViShares Silver Trust-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AAAU or SLV?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Silver Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Silver Trust, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is more attractive than iShares Silver Trust.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF0 0 0 SLViShares Silver Trust0 0 0 -
Is AAAU or SLV More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, which suggesting that the stock is 86.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Silver Trust has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.885%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AAAU or SLV?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Silver Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Silver Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AAAU or SLV?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Silver Trust quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Silver Trust's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Silver Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Silver Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- -- SLViShares Silver Trust-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AAAU or UNG?
United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of -- beat United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- UNGUnited States Natural Gas Fund LP-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AAAU or UNG?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Natural Gas Fund LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has higher upside potential than United States Natural Gas Fund LP, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is more attractive than United States Natural Gas Fund LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF0 0 0 UNGUnited States Natural Gas Fund LP0 0 0 -
Is AAAU or UNG More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, which suggesting that the stock is 86.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AAAU or UNG?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Natural Gas Fund LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AAAU or UNG?
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of -- is lower than United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Natural Gas Fund LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is -- versus -- for United States Natural Gas Fund LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF-- -- -- -- UNGUnited States Natural Gas Fund LP-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
