GIB.A.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nerds On Site, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -6.67%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Nerds On Site, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.14%. On the other hand Nerds On Site, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nerds On Site, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Nerds On Site, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nerds On Site, Inc. has a beta of 2.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.427%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Nerds On Site, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Nerds On Site, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Nerds On Site, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Nerds On Site, Inc.'s net income of -$213.4K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Nerds On Site, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.80x versus 0.14x for Nerds On Site, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Open Text Corp. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of 11.39%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Open Text Corp.'s return on equity of 12.23%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.14%. On the other hand Open Text Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.09 which suggests that it could grow by 8.9%. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Open Text Corp., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Open Text Corp..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Open Text Corp. has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.975%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Open Text Corp. offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Open Text Corp. pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Open Text Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Open Text Corp.'s net income of $202M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Open Text Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.80x versus 1.65x for Open Text Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XTM, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -207.35%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat XTM, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.14%. On the other hand XTM, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than XTM, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than XTM, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XTM, Inc. has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.071%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. XTM, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. XTM, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than XTM, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than XTM, Inc.'s net income of -$5M. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while XTM, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.80x versus 0.46x for XTM, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Windfall Geotek, Inc. has a net margin of 9.5% compared to CGI, Inc.'s net margin of -534.5%. CGI, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.6% beat Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s return on equity of -708.33%.

CGI, Inc. has a consensus price target of $154.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.14%. On the other hand Windfall Geotek, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CGI, Inc. has higher upside potential than Windfall Geotek, Inc., analysts believe CGI, Inc. is more attractive than Windfall Geotek, Inc..

CGI, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, which suggesting that the stock is 60.67% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Windfall Geotek, Inc. has a beta of 1.905, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.476%.

CGI, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Windfall Geotek, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CGI, Inc. pays 8.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Windfall Geotek, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CGI, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CGI, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Windfall Geotek, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20K. CGI, Inc.'s net income of $381.4M is higher than Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s net income of -$106.9K. Notably, CGI, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Windfall Geotek, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CGI, Inc. is 1.80x versus 18.71x for Windfall Geotek, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.