Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
67
GCG.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$67.25
Seasonality move
:
6.36%
Day range:
$67.25 - $67.30
52-week range:
$38.50 - $67.90
Dividend yield:
2.29%
P/E ratio:
9.06x
P/S ratio:
2.75x
P/B ratio:
1.19x
Volume:
1K
Avg. volume:
410
1-year change:
50.82%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$420.1M
EPS (TTM):
$7.43
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCG.TO
Guardian Capital Group Ltd.
|
$97.4M | -- | -35.2% | -- | -- |
|
BTC.CX
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNR.V
49 North Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LUXX.CX
Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIVO.V
Miivo Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIX.CX
Sixty Six Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCG.TO
Guardian Capital Group Ltd.
|
$67.25 | -- | $1.7B | 9.06x | $0.39 | 2.29% | 2.75x |
|
BTC.CX
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
|
$0.07 | -- | $5.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 111.79x |
|
FNR.V
49 North Resources, Inc.
|
$0.03 | -- | $2.5M | 60.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 53.07x |
|
LUXX.CX
Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.20 | -- | $3.3M | 59.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.57x |
|
MIVO.V
Miivo Holdings Corp.
|
$0.6000 | -- | $17.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 687.50x |
|
SIX.CX
Sixty Six Capital, Inc.
|
$0.06 | -- | $13.9M | 1.63x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCG.TO
Guardian Capital Group Ltd.
|
11.22% | 2.344 | 10.5% | 0.67x |
|
BTC.CX
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
|
4.37% | 0.041 | 1.98% | 1.89x |
|
FNR.V
49 North Resources, Inc.
|
43.9% | -1.047 | 142.9% | 0.59x |
|
LUXX.CX
Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | 5.328 | -- | 1.61x |
|
MIVO.V
Miivo Holdings Corp.
|
-- | 1.881 | -- | 4.96x |
|
SIX.CX
Sixty Six Capital, Inc.
|
3.96% | 2.953 | 3.46% | 6.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCG.TO
Guardian Capital Group Ltd.
|
$174.5M | $86.1M | 12.03% | 13.61% | 46.76% | $66.1M |
|
BTC.CX
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.
|
-$83.9K | -$119.5K | -250.01% | -267.52% | -905.3% | -$130.8K |
|
FNR.V
49 North Resources, Inc.
|
$157K | $588K | 0.62% | 1.11% | 365.22% | -$205K |
|
LUXX.CX
Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -$217.2K | -- | -- | -- | -$929.1K |
|
MIVO.V
Miivo Holdings Corp.
|
-- | -$267.3K | -127.75% | -128.78% | -1493.3% | -$231.5K |
|
SIX.CX
Sixty Six Capital, Inc.
|
-- | -$220.6K | 33.34% | 43.28% | -11226.65% | $60.4K |
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GCG.TO or BTC.CX?
Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. has a net margin of 38.33% compared to Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net margin of -931.06%. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.61% beat Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.'s return on equity of -267.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.94.76% $2.89 $1.6B BTC.CXBluesky Digital Assets Corp.-635.61% -$0.00 $2.9M -
What do Analysts Say About GCG.TO or BTC.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bluesky Digital Assets Corp., analysts believe Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is more attractive than Bluesky Digital Assets Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.0 0 0 BTC.CXBluesky Digital Assets Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GCG.TO or BTC.CX More Risky?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. has a beta of 9.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 840.96%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCG.TO or BTC.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian Capital Group Ltd. pays 33.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCG.TO or BTC.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are larger than Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.2K. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net income of $70.6M is higher than Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.'s net income of -$122.9K. Notably, Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is 2.75x versus 111.79x for Bluesky Digital Assets Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.2.75x 9.06x $184.1M $70.6M BTC.CXBluesky Digital Assets Corp.111.79x -- $13.2K -$122.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns GCG.TO or FNR.V?
49 North Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 38.33% compared to Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.61% beat 49 North Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.94.76% $2.89 $1.6B FNR.V49 North Resources, Inc.97.52% $0.00 $14M -
What do Analysts Say About GCG.TO or FNR.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 49 North Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than 49 North Resources, Inc., analysts believe Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is more attractive than 49 North Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.0 0 0 FNR.V49 North Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GCG.TO or FNR.V More Risky?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 49 North Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.271%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCG.TO or FNR.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. 49 North Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian Capital Group Ltd. pays 33.7% of its earnings as a dividend. 49 North Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCG.TO or FNR.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are larger than 49 North Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $161K. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net income of $70.6M is higher than 49 North Resources, Inc.'s net income of $566K. Notably, Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while 49 North Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 60.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is 2.75x versus 53.07x for 49 North Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.2.75x 9.06x $184.1M $70.6M FNR.V49 North Resources, Inc.53.07x 60.00x $161K $566K
-
Which has Higher Returns GCG.TO or LUXX.CX?
Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 38.33% compared to Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.61% beat Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.94.76% $2.89 $1.6B LUXX.CXLuxxfolio Holdings, Inc.-- -$0.02 $714.8K -
What do Analysts Say About GCG.TO or LUXX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1438.46%. Given that Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Guardian Capital Group Ltd., analysts believe Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Guardian Capital Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.0 0 0 LUXX.CXLuxxfolio Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GCG.TO or LUXX.CX More Risky?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 6.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.6%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCG.TO or LUXX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian Capital Group Ltd. pays 33.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCG.TO or LUXX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are larger than Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net income of $70.6M is higher than Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$268.1K. Notably, Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 59.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is 2.75x versus 0.57x for Luxxfolio Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.2.75x 9.06x $184.1M $70.6M LUXX.CXLuxxfolio Holdings, Inc.0.57x 59.07x -- -$268.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns GCG.TO or MIVO.V?
Miivo Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 38.33% compared to Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net margin of -1467.04%. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.61% beat Miivo Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -128.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.94.76% $2.89 $1.6B MIVO.VMiivo Holdings Corp.-- -$0.01 $440K -
What do Analysts Say About GCG.TO or MIVO.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Miivo Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Miivo Holdings Corp., analysts believe Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is more attractive than Miivo Holdings Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.0 0 0 MIVO.VMiivo Holdings Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GCG.TO or MIVO.V More Risky?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miivo Holdings Corp. has a beta of -0.024, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCG.TO or MIVO.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Miivo Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian Capital Group Ltd. pays 33.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Miivo Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCG.TO or MIVO.V?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are larger than Miivo Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $17.9K. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net income of $70.6M is higher than Miivo Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$262.6K. Notably, Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Miivo Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is 2.75x versus 687.50x for Miivo Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.2.75x 9.06x $184.1M $70.6M MIVO.VMiivo Holdings Corp.687.50x -- $17.9K -$262.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns GCG.TO or SIX.CX?
Sixty Six Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 38.33% compared to Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net margin of -11831.59%. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.61% beat Sixty Six Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.94.76% $2.89 $1.6B SIX.CXSixty Six Capital, Inc.-- $0.00 $22.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GCG.TO or SIX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sixty Six Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sixty Six Capital, Inc., analysts believe Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is more attractive than Sixty Six Capital, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.0 0 0 SIX.CXSixty Six Capital, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is GCG.TO or SIX.CX More Risky?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a beta of 1.100, which suggesting that the stock is 10.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sixty Six Capital, Inc. has a beta of 3.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.373%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCG.TO or SIX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Sixty Six Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guardian Capital Group Ltd. pays 33.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Sixty Six Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCG.TO or SIX.CX?
Guardian Capital Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are larger than Sixty Six Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s net income of $70.6M is higher than Sixty Six Capital, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Guardian Capital Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.06x while Sixty Six Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guardian Capital Group Ltd. is 2.75x versus -- for Sixty Six Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCG.TOGuardian Capital Group Ltd.2.75x 9.06x $184.1M $70.6M SIX.CXSixty Six Capital, Inc.-- 1.63x -- $1.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 12.07% over the past day.
Sell
45
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is down 2.39% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 0.19% over the past day.
