PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 14.93%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s return on equity of 345.67%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.96%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive Co. has an analysts' consensus of $87.32 which suggests that it could grow by 11.43%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive Co., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive Co. has a beta of 0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.053%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Colgate-Palmolive Co. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive Co. pays out 56.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than Colgate-Palmolive Co. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s net income of $766M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Colgate-Palmolive Co.'s PE ratio is 21.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.16x versus 3.18x for Colgate-Palmolive Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark Corp. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 8.29%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s return on equity of 135.54%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.96%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $127.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that Kimberly-Clark Corp. has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble Co., analysts believe Kimberly-Clark Corp. is more attractive than Procter & Gamble Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark Corp. has a beta of 0.251, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.946%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Kimberly-Clark Corp. offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark Corp. pays out 64.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s net income of $344M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Kimberly-Clark Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.16x versus 1.86x for Kimberly-Clark Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International, Inc. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 7.66%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat Mondelez International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.31%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.96%. On the other hand Mondelez International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $68.46 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Mondelez International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble Co., analysts believe Mondelez International, Inc. is more attractive than Procter & Gamble Co..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International, Inc. has a beta of 0.388, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.206%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Mondelez International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International, Inc. pays out 52.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are larger than Mondelez International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than Mondelez International, Inc.'s net income of $746M. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while Mondelez International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.16x versus 1.90x for Mondelez International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo, Inc. has a net margin of 21.36% compared to Procter & Gamble Co.'s net margin of 10.94%. Procter & Gamble Co.'s return on equity of 32.18% beat PepsiCo, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.53%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a consensus price target of $168.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.96%. On the other hand PepsiCo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $155.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.23%. Given that Procter & Gamble Co. has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, Inc., analysts believe Procter & Gamble Co. is more attractive than PepsiCo, Inc..

Procter & Gamble Co. has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo, Inc. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.023%.

Procter & Gamble Co. has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. PepsiCo, Inc. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Procter & Gamble Co. pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo, Inc. pays out 76.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble Co. quarterly revenues are $22.4B, which are smaller than PepsiCo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.9B. Procter & Gamble Co.'s net income of $4.8B is higher than PepsiCo, Inc.'s net income of $2.6B. Notably, Procter & Gamble Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.09x while PepsiCo, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble Co. is 4.16x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.