RBGPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diageo Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Diageo Plc's return on equity of 18.76%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diageo Plc has an analysts' consensus of $104.60 which suggests that it could grow by 17.32%. Given that Diageo Plc has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Diageo Plc is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo Plc has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.988%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Diageo Plc offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo Plc pays out 95.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo Plc quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Diageo Plc's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while Diageo Plc's PE ratio is 21.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.04x versus 2.44x for Diageo Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomad Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of 7.66%. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Nomad Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.59%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomad Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.87 which suggests that it could grow by 31.66%. Given that Nomad Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Nomad Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.311%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Nomad Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods Ltd. pays out 39.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of $879.2M. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods Ltd.'s net income of $67.3M. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while Nomad Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.04x versus 0.58x for Nomad Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net margin of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's return on equity of 18.01% beat Unilever Plc's return on equity of 25.84%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever Plc has an analysts' consensus of $71.45 which suggests that it could grow by 9.75%. Given that Unilever Plc has higher upside potential than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc, analysts believe Unilever Plc is more attractive than Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever Plc has a beta of 0.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.334%.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Unilever Plc offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc pays 99.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever Plc pays out 74.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever Plc quarterly revenues of --. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Unilever Plc's net income of --. Notably, Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.18x while Unilever Plc's PE ratio is 23.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc is 3.04x versus 2.21x for Unilever Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.