GMWKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ECARX Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Games Workshop Group Plc's net margin of 0.41%. Games Workshop Group Plc's return on equity of 72.17% beat ECARX Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ECARX Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.64 which suggests that it could grow by 120.3%. Given that ECARX Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Games Workshop Group Plc, analysts believe ECARX Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Games Workshop Group Plc.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ECARX Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. ECARX Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Games Workshop Group Plc pays 87.41% of its earnings as a dividend. ECARX Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Games Workshop Group Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Games Workshop Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ECARX Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $219.9M. Games Workshop Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than ECARX Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $900K. Notably, Games Workshop Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while ECARX Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Games Workshop Group Plc is 10.61x versus 0.68x for ECARX Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gambling.com Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Games Workshop Group Plc's net margin of -9.9%. Games Workshop Group Plc's return on equity of 72.17% beat Gambling.com Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42%.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gambling.com Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.83 which suggests that it could grow by 69.55%. Given that Gambling.com Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Games Workshop Group Plc, analysts believe Gambling.com Group Ltd. is more attractive than Games Workshop Group Plc.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gambling.com Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Gambling.com Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Games Workshop Group Plc pays 87.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Gambling.com Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Games Workshop Group Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Games Workshop Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gambling.com Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $39M. Games Workshop Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Gambling.com Group Ltd.'s net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Games Workshop Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while Gambling.com Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Games Workshop Group Plc is 10.61x versus 1.20x for Gambling.com Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InterContinental Hotels Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Games Workshop Group Plc's net margin of --. Games Workshop Group Plc's return on equity of 72.17% beat InterContinental Hotels Group Plc's return on equity of --.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InterContinental Hotels Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of $127.00 which suggests that it could fall by -11.45%. Given that InterContinental Hotels Group Plc has higher upside potential than Games Workshop Group Plc, analysts believe InterContinental Hotels Group Plc is more attractive than Games Workshop Group Plc.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InterContinental Hotels Group Plc has a beta of 1.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.469%.

Games Workshop Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. InterContinental Hotels Group Plc offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Games Workshop Group Plc pays 87.41% of its earnings as a dividend. InterContinental Hotels Group Plc pays out 42.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Games Workshop Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than InterContinental Hotels Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. Games Workshop Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than InterContinental Hotels Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, Games Workshop Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.07x while InterContinental Hotels Group Plc's PE ratio is 30.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Games Workshop Group Plc is 10.61x versus 4.44x for InterContinental Hotels Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.