CLH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net margin of --. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.75% beat Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a consensus price target of $250.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Clean Harbors, Inc. is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc..

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 90.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8965.269%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net income of $118.8M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.16x while Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors, Inc. is 2.16x versus 0.70x for Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net margin of --. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.75% beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a consensus price target of $250.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clean Harbors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe Clean Harbors, Inc. is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clean Harbors, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clean Harbors, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net income of $118.8M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, Clean Harbors, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.16x while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors, Inc. is 2.16x versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veralto Corp. has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net margin of 17.02%. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.75% beat Veralto Corp.'s return on equity of 38.61%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a consensus price target of $250.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Veralto Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $114.18 which suggests that it could grow by 11.93%. Given that Veralto Corp. has higher upside potential than Clean Harbors, Inc., analysts believe Veralto Corp. is more attractive than Clean Harbors, Inc..

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veralto Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veralto Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Clean Harbors, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veralto Corp. pays out 11.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Veralto Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Harbors, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Veralto Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net income of $118.8M is lower than Veralto Corp.'s net income of $239M. Notably, Clean Harbors, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.16x while Veralto Corp.'s PE ratio is 27.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors, Inc. is 2.16x versus 4.68x for Veralto Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management, Inc. has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net margin of 9.36%. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.75% beat Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a consensus price target of $250.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Waste Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.48 which suggests that it could grow by 12.21%. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Clean Harbors, Inc., analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Clean Harbors, Inc..

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.526% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.647%.

Clean Harbors, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Clean Harbors, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc. pays out 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clean Harbors, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Clean Harbors, Inc.'s net income of $118.8M is lower than Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M. Notably, Clean Harbors, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 33.16x while Waste Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clean Harbors, Inc. is 2.16x versus 3.58x for Waste Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.