K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills, Inc. has a net margin of 9.63% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 26.65%. Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05% beat General Mills, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.01%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand General Mills, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.37 which suggests that it could grow by 15.52%. Given that General Mills, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills, Inc. is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, which suggesting that the stock is 76.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills, Inc. has a beta of -0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.319%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. General Mills, Inc. offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Kellanova pays 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills, Inc. pays out 58.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than General Mills, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Kellanova's net income of $314M is lower than General Mills, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while General Mills, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.30x versus 1.33x for General Mills, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz Co. has a net margin of 9.63% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 9.83%. Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05% beat The Kraft Heinz Co.'s return on equity of -9.47%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.08 which suggests that it could grow by 8.19%. Given that The Kraft Heinz Co. has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz Co. is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, which suggesting that the stock is 76.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz Co. has a beta of 0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.44%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. The Kraft Heinz Co. offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Kellanova pays 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co. pays out 70.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz Co. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Kellanova's net income of $314M is lower than The Kraft Heinz Co.'s net income of $613M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while The Kraft Heinz Co.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.30x versus 1.19x for The Kraft Heinz Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WK Kellogg Co. has a net margin of 9.63% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 1.31%. Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05% beat WK Kellogg Co.'s return on equity of 9.99%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand WK Kellogg Co. has an analysts' consensus of $23.19 which suggests that it could grow by 0.81%. Given that WK Kellogg Co. has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe WK Kellogg Co. is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, which suggesting that the stock is 76.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg Co. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. WK Kellogg Co. offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kellanova pays 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg Co. pays out 77.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than WK Kellogg Co. quarterly revenues of $613M. Kellanova's net income of $314M is higher than WK Kellogg Co.'s net income of $8M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while WK Kellogg Co.'s PE ratio is 62.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.30x versus 0.77x for WK Kellogg Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & Co., Inc. has a net margin of 9.63% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 13.07%. Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05% beat McCormick & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 14.05%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.39, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand McCormick & Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $76.92 which suggests that it could grow by 19.97%. Given that McCormick & Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe McCormick & Co., Inc. is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, which suggesting that the stock is 76.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.744%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. McCormick & Co., Inc. offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Kellanova pays 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & Co., Inc. pays out 57.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than McCormick & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Kellanova's net income of $314M is higher than McCormick & Co., Inc.'s net income of $225.5M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while McCormick & Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.30x versus 2.55x for McCormick & Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.