SCLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Northann has a net margin of -- compared to Suncliff's net margin of --. Suncliff's return on equity of -- beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Suncliff has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Suncliff has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Suncliff is more attractive than Northann.

Suncliff has a beta of 52.637, which suggesting that the stock is 5163.729% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Suncliff has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suncliff pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Suncliff quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Suncliff's net income of -- is lower than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Suncliff's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suncliff is 0.56x versus 0.36x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Purple Innovation has a net margin of -- compared to Suncliff's net margin of -33.08%. Suncliff's return on equity of -- beat Purple Innovation's return on equity of -131.76%.

Suncliff has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Purple Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 105.58%. Given that Purple Innovation has higher upside potential than Suncliff, analysts believe Purple Innovation is more attractive than Suncliff.

Suncliff has a beta of 52.637, which suggesting that the stock is 5163.729% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purple Innovation has a beta of 2.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.868%.

Suncliff has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purple Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suncliff pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purple Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Suncliff quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Purple Innovation quarterly revenues of $118.6M. Suncliff's net income of -- is lower than Purple Innovation's net income of -$39.2M. Notably, Suncliff's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purple Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suncliff is 0.56x versus 0.19x for Purple Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silicon Graphics International Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Suncliff's net margin of --. Suncliff's return on equity of -- beat Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Suncliff has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Silicon Graphics International Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Suncliff has higher upside potential than Silicon Graphics International Corp., analysts believe Suncliff is more attractive than Silicon Graphics International Corp..

Suncliff has a beta of 52.637, which suggesting that the stock is 5163.729% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silicon Graphics International Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Suncliff has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silicon Graphics International Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suncliff pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silicon Graphics International Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Suncliff quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Silicon Graphics International Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Suncliff's net income of -- is lower than Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Suncliff's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silicon Graphics International Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suncliff is 0.56x versus -- for Silicon Graphics International Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sleep Number has a net margin of -- compared to Suncliff's net margin of -1.24%. Suncliff's return on equity of -- beat Sleep Number's return on equity of --.

Suncliff has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sleep Number has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could grow by 58.73%. Given that Sleep Number has higher upside potential than Suncliff, analysts believe Sleep Number is more attractive than Suncliff.

Suncliff has a beta of 52.637, which suggesting that the stock is 5163.729% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sleep Number has a beta of 2.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.104%.

Suncliff has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sleep Number offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Suncliff pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sleep Number pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Suncliff quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sleep Number quarterly revenues of $376.8M. Suncliff's net income of -- is lower than Sleep Number's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Suncliff's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sleep Number's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Suncliff is 0.56x versus 0.10x for Sleep Number. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.