QWTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enviro-Serv, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Water Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enviro-Serv, Inc., analysts believe Quest Water Global, Inc. is more attractive than Enviro-Serv, Inc..

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a beta of 1.413, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.293%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enviro-Serv, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro-Serv, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Enviro-Serv, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K is higher than Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Quest Water Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global, Inc. is -- versus 0.64x for Enviro-Serv, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net margin of 6.38%. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.28%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.53%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, Inc., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than Quest Water Global, Inc..

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.349%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GFL Environmental, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays out 3.82% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K is lower than GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $78.5M. Notably, Quest Water Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GFL Environmental, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global, Inc. is -- versus 3.47x for GFL Environmental, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Water Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Quest Water Global, Inc. is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc..

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 90.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8965.269%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K is higher than Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Quest Water Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global, Inc. is -- versus 0.77x for Pacific Green Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net margin of 9.36%. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.42%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waste Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $246.52 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Waste Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, Inc., analysts believe Waste Management, Inc. is more attractive than Quest Water Global, Inc..

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.199, which suggesting that the stock is 80.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management, Inc. has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.647%.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management, Inc. offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc. pays out 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Waste Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K is lower than Waste Management, Inc.'s net income of $603M. Notably, Quest Water Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waste Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Water Global, Inc. is -- versus 3.52x for Waste Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.