PRKV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Correlate Energy has a net margin of -- compared to ParkVida Group's net margin of -50.54%. ParkVida Group's return on equity of -- beat Correlate Energy's return on equity of --.

ParkVida Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Correlate Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParkVida Group has higher upside potential than Correlate Energy, analysts believe ParkVida Group is more attractive than Correlate Energy.

ParkVida Group has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Correlate Energy has a beta of -0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 194.65%.

ParkVida Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Correlate Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParkVida Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Correlate Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ParkVida Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Correlate Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5M. ParkVida Group's net income of -- is lower than Correlate Energy's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, ParkVida Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Correlate Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParkVida Group is -- versus 0.24x for Correlate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digital Locations has a net margin of -- compared to ParkVida Group's net margin of --. ParkVida Group's return on equity of -- beat Digital Locations's return on equity of --.

ParkVida Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Digital Locations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75555455.56%. Given that Digital Locations has higher upside potential than ParkVida Group, analysts believe Digital Locations is more attractive than ParkVida Group.

ParkVida Group has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Locations has a beta of 2.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.747%.

ParkVida Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Locations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParkVida Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Locations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ParkVida Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Digital Locations quarterly revenues of --. ParkVida Group's net income of -- is lower than Digital Locations's net income of $2.5M. Notably, ParkVida Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digital Locations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParkVida Group is -- versus 45.97x for Digital Locations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Social Detention has a net margin of -- compared to ParkVida Group's net margin of --. ParkVida Group's return on equity of -- beat Social Detention's return on equity of --.

ParkVida Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Social Detention has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ParkVida Group has higher upside potential than Social Detention, analysts believe ParkVida Group is more attractive than Social Detention.

ParkVida Group has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Social Detention has a beta of 2.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.247%.

ParkVida Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Social Detention offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParkVida Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Social Detention pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ParkVida Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Social Detention quarterly revenues of --. ParkVida Group's net income of -- is lower than Social Detention's net income of --. Notably, ParkVida Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Social Detention's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParkVida Group is -- versus -- for Social Detention. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovate has a net margin of -- compared to ParkVida Group's net margin of -6.19%. ParkVida Group's return on equity of -- beat Innovate's return on equity of --.

ParkVida Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 852.38%. Given that Innovate has higher upside potential than ParkVida Group, analysts believe Innovate is more attractive than ParkVida Group.

ParkVida Group has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.056% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovate has a beta of 2.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.61%.

ParkVida Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ParkVida Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovate pays out -6.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

ParkVida Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovate quarterly revenues of $242.2M. ParkVida Group's net income of -- is lower than Innovate's net income of -$15M. Notably, ParkVida Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ParkVida Group is -- versus 0.05x for Innovate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.