BADFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dycom Industries has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net margin of 3.01%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's return on equity of 18.98% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 20.24%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $213.13 which suggests that it could grow by 36.65%. Given that Dycom Industries has higher upside potential than Badger Infrastructure Solutions, analysts believe Dycom Industries is more attractive than Badger Infrastructure Solutions.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.998%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Badger Infrastructure Solutions pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions quarterly revenues are $187.2M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net income of $10.9M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Badger Infrastructure Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.61x while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 19.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Badger Infrastructure Solutions is 1.14x versus 0.98x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Services of America has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net margin of 0.85%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's return on equity of 18.98% beat Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy Services of America has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 109.64%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Badger Infrastructure Solutions, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Badger Infrastructure Solutions.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.686%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Energy Services of America offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Badger Infrastructure Solutions pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America pays out 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions quarterly revenues are $187.2M, which are larger than Energy Services of America quarterly revenues of $100.6M. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net income of $10.9M is higher than Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K. Notably, Badger Infrastructure Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.61x while Energy Services of America's PE ratio is 6.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Badger Infrastructure Solutions is 1.14x versus 0.44x for Energy Services of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYR Group has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net margin of 1.92%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's return on equity of 18.98% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 4.82%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $148.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 28.57%. Given that MYR Group has higher upside potential than Badger Infrastructure Solutions, analysts believe MYR Group is more attractive than Badger Infrastructure Solutions.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.113%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Badger Infrastructure Solutions pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions quarterly revenues are $187.2M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $829.8M. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net income of $10.9M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $16M. Notably, Badger Infrastructure Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.61x while MYR Group's PE ratio is 62.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Badger Infrastructure Solutions is 1.14x versus 0.57x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shimmick has a net margin of 5.81% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net margin of -37.14%. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's return on equity of 18.98% beat Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shimmick has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.47%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than Badger Infrastructure Solutions, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than Badger Infrastructure Solutions.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a beta of 0.922, which suggesting that the stock is 7.802% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Shimmick offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Badger Infrastructure Solutions pays 37.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Shimmick pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Badger Infrastructure Solutions quarterly revenues are $187.2M, which are larger than Shimmick quarterly revenues of $103.6M. Badger Infrastructure Solutions's net income of $10.9M is higher than Shimmick's net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Badger Infrastructure Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.61x while Shimmick's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Badger Infrastructure Solutions is 1.14x versus 0.09x for Shimmick. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.