X Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 7.16%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.98%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, which suggesting that the stock is 86.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.87x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of -10.34%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.98%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.5%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, which suggesting that the stock is 86.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.26x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of -9.2%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 3.18%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.98%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $58.21 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, which suggesting that the stock is 86.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.765%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.9B. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of -$175.7M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 41.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -2.54% compared to United States Steel's net margin of 5.35%. United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

United States Steel has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 4.98%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.6%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than United States Steel.

United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, which suggesting that the stock is 86.249% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

United States Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. United States Steel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Steel quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. United States Steel's net income of -$89M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, United States Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Steel is 0.63x versus 1.13x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.