TGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AeroVironment has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Triumph Group's net margin of -1.05%. Triumph Group's return on equity of -- beat AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93%.

Triumph Group has a consensus price target of $22.22, signalling downside risk potential of -12.52%. On the other hand AeroVironment has an analysts' consensus of $203.94 which suggests that it could grow by 63.42%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AeroVironment has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.939%.

Triumph Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AeroVironment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Triumph Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AeroVironment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Triumph Group quarterly revenues are $315.6M, which are larger than AeroVironment quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M is higher than AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Triumph Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.53x while AeroVironment's PE ratio is 105.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Group is 1.58x versus 4.73x for AeroVironment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Triumph Group's net margin of 9.07%. Triumph Group's return on equity of -- beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79%.

Triumph Group has a consensus price target of $22.22, signalling downside risk potential of -12.52%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.12%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Triumph Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Triumph Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Triumph Group quarterly revenues are $315.6M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $981M. Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M. Notably, Triumph Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.53x while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 41.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Group is 1.58x versus 2.74x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Triumph Group's net margin of 8.61%. Triumph Group's return on equity of -- beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

Triumph Group has a consensus price target of $22.22, signalling downside risk potential of -12.52%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.395%.

Triumph Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Triumph Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Triumph Group quarterly revenues are $315.6M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Triumph Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.53x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Group is 1.58x versus 1.56x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Triumph Group's net margin of 17.57%. Triumph Group's return on equity of -- beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Triumph Group has a consensus price target of $22.22, signalling downside risk potential of -12.52%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $226.46 which suggests that it could grow by 12.79%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Triumph Group has a beta of 2.626, which suggesting that the stock is 162.606% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.166%.

Triumph Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Triumph Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Triumph Group quarterly revenues are $315.6M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Triumph Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.53x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Triumph Group is 1.58x versus 4.80x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.