Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Buy
54
TEAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.37
Seasonality move
:
-1.81%
Day range:
$11.34 - $11.43
52-week range:
$10.09 - $13.34
Dividend yield:
9.5%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
14.4K
Avg. volume:
48.2K
1-year change:
-3.69%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEAF
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPZ
Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEAF
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term
|
$11.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 9.5% | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
$41.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 7.82% | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
$31.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.36 | 4.44% | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$40.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 10.08% | -- |
|
TPZ
Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd
|
$20.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.44% | -- |
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
$49.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.8% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEAF
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term
|
-- | 0.879 | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | 1.552 | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.916 | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 1.607 | -- | -- |
|
TPZ
Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd
|
-- | 0.941 | -- | -- |
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | 0.981 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TEAF
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPZ
Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TEAF or AMZA?
InfraCap MLP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net margin of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's return on equity of -- beat InfraCap MLP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TEAF or AMZA?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InfraCap MLP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has higher upside potential than InfraCap MLP ETF, analysts believe Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is more attractive than InfraCap MLP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term0 0 0 AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF0 0 0 -
Is TEAF or AMZA More Risky?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InfraCap MLP ETF has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.13%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TEAF or AMZA?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.5%. InfraCap MLP ETF offers a yield of 7.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. InfraCap MLP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TEAF or AMZA?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than InfraCap MLP ETF quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net income of -- is lower than InfraCap MLP ETF's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InfraCap MLP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is -- versus -- for InfraCap MLP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TEAF or ENFR?
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net margin of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TEAF or ENFR?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has higher upside potential than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is more attractive than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term0 0 0 ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is TEAF or ENFR More Risky?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.08%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TEAF or ENFR?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.5%. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TEAF or ENFR?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is -- versus -- for ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TEAF or SRV?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net margin of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's return on equity of -- beat NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TEAF or SRV?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has higher upside potential than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is more attractive than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term0 0 0 SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 -
Is TEAF or SRV More Risky?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.484%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TEAF or SRV?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.5%. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund offers a yield of 10.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TEAF or SRV?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net income of -- is lower than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is -- versus -- for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TEAF or TPZ?
Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net margin of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- TPZTortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TEAF or TPZ?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has higher upside potential than Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd, analysts believe Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is more attractive than Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term0 0 0 TPZTortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd0 0 0 -
Is TEAF or TPZ More Risky?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.6%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TEAF or TPZ?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.5%. Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TEAF or TPZ?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is -- versus -- for Tortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- -- TPZTortoise Power & Energy Infra Fd-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TEAF or UMI?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net margin of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's return on equity of -- beat USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TEAF or UMI?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has higher upside potential than USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is more attractive than USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term0 0 0 UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is TEAF or UMI More Risky?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.906% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TEAF or UMI?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.5%. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TEAF or UMI?
Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's net income of -- is lower than USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Essential Assets Income Term is -- versus -- for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TEAFTortoise Essential Assets Income Term-- -- -- -- UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
From time to time, investors will run across the term…
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
