SNV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 22.69%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $71.49 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that Synovus Financial has higher upside potential than Comerica, analysts believe Synovus Financial is more attractive than Comerica.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.583%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.78x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 3.88x versus 2.55x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flushing Financial has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 17.11%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Flushing Financial's return on equity of 3.89%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Flushing Financial has an analysts' consensus of $17.38 which suggests that it could grow by 21.84%. Given that Flushing Financial has higher upside potential than Synovus Financial, analysts believe Flushing Financial is more attractive than Synovus Financial.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flushing Financial has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.723%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Flushing Financial offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Flushing Financial pays out 91.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than Flushing Financial quarterly revenues of $52.1M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than Flushing Financial's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.78x while Flushing Financial's PE ratio is 16.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 3.88x versus 2.14x for Flushing Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heartland Financial USA has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 31.56%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat Heartland Financial USA's return on equity of 4.3%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand Heartland Financial USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.16%. Given that Synovus Financial has higher upside potential than Heartland Financial USA, analysts believe Synovus Financial is more attractive than Heartland Financial USA.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Financial USA has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.876%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Heartland Financial USA offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA pays out 74.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than Heartland Financial USA quarterly revenues of $203.3M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than Heartland Financial USA's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.78x while Heartland Financial USA's PE ratio is 34.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 3.88x versus 4.44x for Heartland Financial USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 32.65% compared to Synovus Financial's net margin of 30.13%. Synovus Financial's return on equity of 7.19% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Synovus Financial has a consensus price target of $40.94, signalling upside risk potential of 20.22%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.89 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Synovus Financial, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Synovus Financial.

Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.374, which suggesting that the stock is 37.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.731%.

Synovus Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Synovus Financial pays 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Synovus Financial quarterly revenues are $556M, which are larger than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Synovus Financial's net income of $181.6M is higher than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Synovus Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.78x while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Synovus Financial is 3.88x versus 3.99x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.