NOVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enphase Energy has a net margin of -63.49% compared to Sunnova Energy International's net margin of 16.24%. Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 11.27%.

Sunnova Energy International has a consensus price target of $2.18, signalling upside risk potential of 431.03%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $79.96 which suggests that it could grow by 29.93%. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, which suggesting that the stock is 163.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 2.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.154%.

Sunnova Energy International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunnova Energy International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues are $224.1M, which are smaller than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $382.7M. Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M is lower than Enphase Energy's net income of $62.2M. Notably, Sunnova Energy International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 83.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunnova Energy International is 0.06x versus 6.51x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SunHydrogen has a net margin of -63.49% compared to Sunnova Energy International's net margin of --. Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72% beat SunHydrogen's return on equity of --.

Sunnova Energy International has a consensus price target of $2.18, signalling upside risk potential of 431.03%. On the other hand SunHydrogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than SunHydrogen, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than SunHydrogen.

Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, which suggesting that the stock is 163.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 269.533%.

Sunnova Energy International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SunHydrogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunnova Energy International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SunHydrogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues are $224.1M, which are larger than SunHydrogen quarterly revenues of --. Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M is lower than SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Sunnova Energy International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SunHydrogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunnova Energy International is 0.06x versus -- for SunHydrogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunrun has a net margin of -63.49% compared to Sunnova Energy International's net margin of -542.66%. Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72% beat Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58%.

Sunnova Energy International has a consensus price target of $2.18, signalling upside risk potential of 431.03%. On the other hand Sunrun has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 123.51%. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than Sunrun, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than Sunrun.

Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, which suggesting that the stock is 163.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.088%.

Sunnova Energy International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunnova Energy International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues are $224.1M, which are smaller than Sunrun quarterly revenues of $518.5M. Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M is higher than Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B. Notably, Sunnova Energy International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunnova Energy International is 0.06x versus 0.74x for Sunrun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarMax Technology has a net margin of -63.49% compared to Sunnova Energy International's net margin of -151.98%. Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72% beat SolarMax Technology's return on equity of --.

Sunnova Energy International has a consensus price target of $2.18, signalling upside risk potential of 431.03%. On the other hand SolarMax Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than SolarMax Technology, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than SolarMax Technology.

Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, which suggesting that the stock is 163.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sunnova Energy International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarMax Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunnova Energy International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarMax Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues are $224.1M, which are larger than SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M is lower than SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Sunnova Energy International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SolarMax Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunnova Energy International is 0.06x versus 1.95x for SolarMax Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.