Financhill
Sell
39

GMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$75.19
Seasonality move :
7.96%
Day range:
$74.76 - $75.84
52-week range:
$65.77 - $105.54
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
20.83x
P/S ratio:
0.54x
P/B ratio:
2.07x
Volume:
170.1K
Avg. volume:
349.2K
1-year change:
-20.59%
Market cap:
$2.9B
Revenue:
$5.5B
EPS (TTM):
$3.61

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GMS
GMS
$1.3B $1.11 -8.29% -20.02% $83.33
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
-- -- -- -- --
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
-- -- -- -- --
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
-- -- -- -- --
TTC
The Toro
$1.4B $1.39 0.08% 0.36% $91.20
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GMS
GMS
$75.19 $83.33 $2.9B 20.83x $0.00 0% 0.54x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$11.34 -- $11M -- $0.03 2.29% 0.41x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$3.47 -- $45.2M 13.88x $0.00 0% 0.54x
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
$31.30 -- $87.5M 12.78x $0.25 3.04% 1.87x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$7.53 -- $11.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.06x
TTC
The Toro
$72.33 $91.20 $7.2B 18.50x $0.38 2.05% 1.64x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GMS
GMS
50.29% 1.172 43.44% 1.30x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- 0.998 -- 2.68x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
42.08% 1.826 40.73% 1.55x
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
-- -0.673 -- 2.30x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
97.85% 2.384 1339.66% 0.16x
TTC
The Toro
43% 1.365 13.25% 0.67x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GMS
GMS
$393.1M $39.8M 5.35% 10.11% 0.46% $83.1M
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$695K -$823.6K -13.89% -13.89% -11.82% -$368.9K
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$4.2M $1.5M 43.19% 84.62% 7.61% $586.9K
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
$3.2M $2M 15.6% 15.6% 14.88% $4.5M
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$8.5M -$12.8M -108.68% -281.97% -77.39% $2.8M
TTC
The Toro
$335.6M $77.8M 15.55% 25.89% 8.15% -$67.7M

GMS vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GMS or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -1.7% compared to GMS's net margin of -20.76%. GMS's return on equity of 10.11% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMS
    GMS
    31.18% -$0.55 $2.8B
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About GMS or CVR?

    GMS has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.83%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GMS has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe GMS is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMS
    GMS
    2 5 0
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
  • Is GMS or CVR More Risky?

    GMS has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.126, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.376%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMS or CVR?

    GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMS or CVR?

    GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. GMS's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.83x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.54x versus 0.41x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMS
    GMS
    0.54x 20.83x $1.3B -$21.4M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.41x -- $7M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMS or CVU?

    CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of -1.7% compared to GMS's net margin of 3.86%. GMS's return on equity of 10.11% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMS
    GMS
    31.18% -$0.55 $2.8B
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    21.73% $0.06 $43.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About GMS or CVU?

    GMS has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.83%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than GMS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMS
    GMS
    2 5 0
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0 0 0
  • Is GMS or CVU More Risky?

    GMS has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.609%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMS or CVU?

    GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMS or CVU?

    GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. GMS's net income of -$21.4M is lower than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.83x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.54x versus 0.54x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMS
    GMS
    0.54x 20.83x $1.3B -$21.4M
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0.54x 13.88x $19.4M $749.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns GMS or ESP?

    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of -1.7% compared to GMS's net margin of 14.02%. GMS's return on equity of 10.11% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMS
    GMS
    31.18% -$0.55 $2.8B
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    23.25% $0.71 $44.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About GMS or ESP?

    GMS has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.83%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.13%. Given that GMS has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe GMS is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMS
    GMS
    2 5 0
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    0 0 0
  • Is GMS or ESP More Risky?

    GMS has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.123%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMS or ESP?

    GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMS or ESP?

    GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $13.6M. GMS's net income of -$21.4M is lower than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.9M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.83x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.54x versus 1.87x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMS
    GMS
    0.54x 20.83x $1.3B -$21.4M
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    1.87x 12.78x $13.6M $1.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMS or GPUS?

    Hyperscale Data has a net margin of -1.7% compared to GMS's net margin of -82.25%. GMS's return on equity of 10.11% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMS
    GMS
    31.18% -$0.55 $2.8B
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    27.51% -$24.85 $126.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About GMS or GPUS?

    GMS has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.83%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6972025.5%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than GMS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMS
    GMS
    2 5 0
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0 0 0
  • Is GMS or GPUS More Risky?

    GMS has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.437%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMS or GPUS?

    GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMS or GPUS?

    GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. GMS's net income of -$21.4M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.83x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.54x versus 0.06x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMS
    GMS
    0.54x 20.83x $1.3B -$21.4M
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0.06x -- $31.1M -$25.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns GMS or TTC?

    The Toro has a net margin of -1.7% compared to GMS's net margin of 5.31%. GMS's return on equity of 10.11% beat The Toro's return on equity of 25.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GMS
    GMS
    31.18% -$0.55 $2.8B
    TTC
    The Toro
    33.73% $0.52 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About GMS or TTC?

    GMS has a consensus price target of $83.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.83%. On the other hand The Toro has an analysts' consensus of $91.20 which suggests that it could grow by 26.09%. Given that The Toro has higher upside potential than GMS, analysts believe The Toro is more attractive than GMS.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GMS
    GMS
    2 5 0
    TTC
    The Toro
    1 4 0
  • Is GMS or TTC More Risky?

    GMS has a beta of 1.659, which suggesting that the stock is 65.917% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toro has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMS or TTC?

    GMS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Toro offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. GMS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GMS or TTC?

    GMS quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than The Toro quarterly revenues of $995M. GMS's net income of -$21.4M is lower than The Toro's net income of $52.8M. Notably, GMS's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.83x while The Toro's PE ratio is 18.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GMS is 0.54x versus 1.64x for The Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GMS
    GMS
    0.54x 20.83x $1.3B -$21.4M
    TTC
    The Toro
    1.64x 18.50x $995M $52.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now

The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…

Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?

Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…

Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock