GHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KYN Capital Group has a net margin of 25.97% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of --. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 8.05% beat KYN Capital Group's return on equity of --.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.7%. On the other hand KYN Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than KYN Capital Group, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than KYN Capital Group.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KYN Capital Group has a beta of 3.886, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 288.613%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KYN Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KYN Capital Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guild Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $377.2M, which are larger than KYN Capital Group quarterly revenues of --. Guild Holdings's net income of $97.9M is higher than KYN Capital Group's net income of --. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while KYN Capital Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.74x versus -- for KYN Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Runway Growth Finance has a net margin of 25.97% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 90.33%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 8.05% beat Runway Growth Finance's return on equity of 14.13%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.7%. On the other hand Runway Growth Finance has an analysts' consensus of $11.78 which suggests that it could grow by 29.71%. Given that Runway Growth Finance has higher upside potential than Guild Holdings, analysts believe Runway Growth Finance is more attractive than Guild Holdings.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Runway Growth Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Runway Growth Finance offers a yield of 16.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Runway Growth Finance pays out 94.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $377.2M, which are larger than Runway Growth Finance quarterly revenues of $31.2M. Guild Holdings's net income of $97.9M is higher than Runway Growth Finance's net income of $28.2M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Runway Growth Finance's PE ratio is 4.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.74x versus 4.11x for Runway Growth Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Security National Financial has a net margin of 25.97% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 13.37%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 8.05% beat Security National Financial's return on equity of 9.18%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.7%. On the other hand Security National Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than Security National Financial, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than Security National Financial.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Security National Financial has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.993%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Security National Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Security National Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guild Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $377.2M, which are larger than Security National Financial quarterly revenues of $88.5M. Guild Holdings's net income of $97.9M is higher than Security National Financial's net income of $11.8M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Security National Financial's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.74x versus 0.68x for Security National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoFi Technologies has a net margin of 25.97% compared to Guild Holdings's net margin of 45.29%. Guild Holdings's return on equity of 8.05% beat SoFi Technologies's return on equity of 8.24%.

Guild Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.7%. On the other hand SoFi Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $13.04 which suggests that it could grow by 14.52%. Given that Guild Holdings has higher upside potential than SoFi Technologies, analysts believe Guild Holdings is more attractive than SoFi Technologies.

Guild Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Guild Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SoFi Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guild Holdings pays 31.61% of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Technologies pays out 3.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Guild Holdings quarterly revenues are $377.2M, which are smaller than SoFi Technologies quarterly revenues of $734.1M. Guild Holdings's net income of $97.9M is lower than SoFi Technologies's net income of $332.5M. Notably, Guild Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while SoFi Technologies's PE ratio is 30.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guild Holdings is 0.74x versus 4.78x for SoFi Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.