GCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of -3.21% compared to Gannett's net margin of -6.36%. Gannett's return on equity of -41.58% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -232.94%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.91%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 65.02%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Gannett.

Gannett has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.019, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.854%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $612.4M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Gannett's net income of -$19.7M is lower than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.33x versus 0.15x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of -3.21% compared to Gannett's net margin of 10.02%. Gannett's return on equity of -41.58% beat New York Times's return on equity of 15.87%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.91%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.7%. Given that Gannett has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Gannett is more attractive than New York Times.

Gannett has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.224%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New York Times offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 29.89% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $612.4M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $640.2M. Gannett's net income of -$19.7M is lower than New York Times's net income of $64.1M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.33x versus 3.46x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of -3.21% compared to Gannett's net margin of 8.96%. Gannett's return on equity of -41.58% beat Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.91%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 101.92%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Gannett.

Gannett has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.977%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scholastic offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $612.4M, which are larger than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $544.6M. Gannett's net income of -$19.7M is lower than Scholastic's net income of $48.8M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 37.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.33x versus 0.37x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of -3.21% compared to Gannett's net margin of 9.48%. Gannett's return on equity of -41.58% beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of -6.48%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.91%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.81%. Given that John Wiley & Sons has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe John Wiley & Sons is more attractive than Gannett.

Gannett has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.686% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.735%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $612.4M, which are larger than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $426.6M. Gannett's net income of -$19.7M is lower than John Wiley & Sons's net income of $40.5M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.33x versus 1.38x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.