GCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lee Enterprises has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Gannett's net margin of -11.59%. Gannett's return on equity of -11.05% beat Lee Enterprises's return on equity of -2850.44%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of $5.53, signalling upside risk potential of 75.96%. On the other hand Lee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 100.2%. Given that Lee Enterprises has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe Lee Enterprises is more attractive than Gannett.

Gannett has a beta of 2.476, which suggesting that the stock is 147.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lee Enterprises has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.204%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lee Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lee Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $621.3M, which are larger than Lee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $144.6M. Gannett's net income of $64.3M is higher than Lee Enterprises's net income of -$16.7M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lee Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.21x versus 0.10x for Lee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New York Times has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Gannett's net margin of 17.03%. Gannett's return on equity of -11.05% beat New York Times's return on equity of 16.15%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of $5.53, signalling upside risk potential of 75.96%. On the other hand New York Times has an analysts' consensus of $56.12 which suggests that it could grow by 15.48%. Given that Gannett has higher upside potential than New York Times, analysts believe Gannett is more attractive than New York Times.

Gannett has a beta of 2.476, which suggesting that the stock is 147.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New York Times has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New York Times offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times pays out 28.2% of its earnings as a dividend. New York Times's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $621.3M, which are smaller than New York Times quarterly revenues of $726.6M. Gannett's net income of $64.3M is lower than New York Times's net income of $123.7M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New York Times's PE ratio is 27.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.21x versus 3.11x for New York Times. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Scholastic has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Gannett's net margin of 8.96%. Gannett's return on equity of -11.05% beat Scholastic's return on equity of -0.43%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of $5.53, signalling upside risk potential of 75.96%. On the other hand Scholastic has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Scholastic has higher upside potential than Gannett, analysts believe Scholastic is more attractive than Gannett.

Gannett has a beta of 2.476, which suggesting that the stock is 147.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Scholastic has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.456%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Scholastic offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Scholastic pays out 204.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $621.3M, which are larger than Scholastic quarterly revenues of $544.6M. Gannett's net income of $64.3M is higher than Scholastic's net income of $48.8M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Scholastic's PE ratio is 49.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.21x versus 0.35x for Scholastic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

John Wiley & Sons has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Gannett's net margin of -5.67%. Gannett's return on equity of -11.05% beat John Wiley & Sons's return on equity of 5.67%.

Gannett has a consensus price target of $5.53, signalling upside risk potential of 75.96%. On the other hand John Wiley & Sons has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.8%. Given that Gannett has higher upside potential than John Wiley & Sons, analysts believe Gannett is more attractive than John Wiley & Sons.

Gannett has a beta of 2.476, which suggesting that the stock is 147.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.692%.

Gannett has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. John Wiley & Sons offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Gannett pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Wiley & Sons pays out -38.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gannett quarterly revenues are $621.3M, which are larger than John Wiley & Sons quarterly revenues of $404.6M. Gannett's net income of $64.3M is higher than John Wiley & Sons's net income of -$23M. Notably, Gannett's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Wiley & Sons's PE ratio is 60.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gannett is 0.21x versus 1.42x for John Wiley & Sons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.