FI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDW has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 5.1%. Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79% beat CDW's return on equity of 48.73%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $254.86, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand CDW has an analysts' consensus of $224.43 which suggests that it could grow by 48.07%. Given that CDW has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe CDW is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDW has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.756%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDW offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDW pays out 30.81% of its earnings as a dividend. CDW's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than CDW quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Fiserv's net income of $938M is higher than CDW's net income of $264.2M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while CDW's PE ratio is 19.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 6.17x versus 0.98x for CDW. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flywire has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -13.53%. Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79% beat Flywire's return on equity of 0.36%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $254.86, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Flywire has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 64.16%. Given that Flywire has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe Flywire is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flywire has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flywire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flywire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Flywire quarterly revenues of $117.6M. Fiserv's net income of $938M is higher than Flywire's net income of -$15.9M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while Flywire's PE ratio is 929.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 6.17x versus 2.39x for Flywire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 0.71%. Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $254.86, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $846.70 which suggests that it could grow by 60.42%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.13%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Fiserv's net income of $938M is higher than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while HubSpot's PE ratio is 5,864.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 6.17x versus 10.47x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intrusion has a net margin of 17.86% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -116.77%. Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79% beat Intrusion's return on equity of -3738%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $254.86, signalling upside risk potential of 17.5%. On the other hand Intrusion has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 450%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intrusion has a beta of -1.257, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 225.681%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intrusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intrusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Intrusion quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Fiserv's net income of $938M is higher than Intrusion's net income of -$2M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.24x while Intrusion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 6.17x versus 1.23x for Intrusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.