DM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Markforged Holding has a net margin of -97.37% compared to Desktop Metal's net margin of -114.09%. Desktop Metal's return on equity of -179.75% beat Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07%.

Desktop Metal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.21%. On the other hand Markforged Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.32%. Given that Desktop Metal has higher upside potential than Markforged Holding, analysts believe Desktop Metal is more attractive than Markforged Holding.

Desktop Metal has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Desktop Metal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Markforged Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Desktop Metal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Markforged Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Desktop Metal quarterly revenues are $36.4M, which are larger than Markforged Holding quarterly revenues of $20.5M. Desktop Metal's net income of -$35.4M is lower than Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Desktop Metal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Markforged Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Desktop Metal is 0.47x versus 0.75x for Markforged Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -97.37% compared to Desktop Metal's net margin of 6.08%. Desktop Metal's return on equity of -179.75% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Desktop Metal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.21%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.65%. Given that Desktop Metal has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Desktop Metal is more attractive than ePlus.

Desktop Metal has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

Desktop Metal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Desktop Metal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Desktop Metal quarterly revenues are $36.4M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Desktop Metal's net income of -$35.4M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Desktop Metal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Desktop Metal is 0.47x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonos has a net margin of -97.37% compared to Desktop Metal's net margin of -20.79%. Desktop Metal's return on equity of -179.75% beat Sonos's return on equity of -7.63%.

Desktop Metal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.21%. On the other hand Sonos has an analysts' consensus of $23.48 which suggests that it could grow by 1.95%. Given that Desktop Metal has higher upside potential than Sonos, analysts believe Desktop Metal is more attractive than Sonos.

Desktop Metal has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonos has a beta of 2.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.629%.

Desktop Metal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Desktop Metal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Desktop Metal quarterly revenues are $36.4M, which are smaller than Sonos quarterly revenues of $255.4M. Desktop Metal's net income of -$35.4M is higher than Sonos's net income of -$53.1M. Notably, Desktop Metal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sonos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Desktop Metal is 0.47x versus 1.23x for Sonos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -97.37% compared to Desktop Metal's net margin of -2.6%. Desktop Metal's return on equity of -179.75% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Desktop Metal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.21%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.18%. Given that Desktop Metal has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Desktop Metal is more attractive than Upland Software.

Desktop Metal has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.379%.

Desktop Metal has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Desktop Metal pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Desktop Metal quarterly revenues are $36.4M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Desktop Metal's net income of -$35.4M is lower than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Desktop Metal's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Desktop Metal is 0.47x versus 0.46x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.