WW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of -38.91% compared to WW International's net margin of 1.07%. WW International's return on equity of -- beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84%.

WW International has a consensus price target of $1.10, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $21.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.72%. Given that WW International has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe WW International is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

WW International has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WW International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WW International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WW International quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $516.2M. WW International's net income of -$72.6M is lower than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, WW International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 391.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WW International is 0.04x versus 1.25x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eventiko has a net margin of -38.91% compared to WW International's net margin of --. WW International's return on equity of -- beat Eventiko's return on equity of --.

WW International has a consensus price target of $1.10, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Eventiko has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WW International has higher upside potential than Eventiko, analysts believe WW International is more attractive than Eventiko.

WW International has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eventiko has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WW International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eventiko offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WW International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eventiko pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WW International quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Eventiko quarterly revenues of --. WW International's net income of -$72.6M is lower than Eventiko's net income of -$4.1K. Notably, WW International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eventiko's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WW International is 0.04x versus -- for Eventiko. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Medifast has a net margin of -38.91% compared to WW International's net margin of -0.67%. WW International's return on equity of -- beat Medifast's return on equity of -3.35%.

WW International has a consensus price target of $1.10, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Medifast has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.65%. Given that WW International has higher upside potential than Medifast, analysts believe WW International is more attractive than Medifast.

WW International has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medifast has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.076%.

WW International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Medifast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share. WW International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Medifast pays out 34.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Medifast's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WW International quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Medifast quarterly revenues of $115.7M. WW International's net income of -$72.6M is lower than Medifast's net income of -$772K. Notably, WW International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medifast's PE ratio is 69.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WW International is 0.04x versus 0.26x for Medifast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interactive Strength has a net margin of -38.91% compared to WW International's net margin of -354.57%. WW International's return on equity of -- beat Interactive Strength's return on equity of --.

WW International has a consensus price target of $1.10, signalling upside risk potential of 197.3%. On the other hand Interactive Strength has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 881993.5%. Given that Interactive Strength has higher upside potential than WW International, analysts believe Interactive Strength is more attractive than WW International.

WW International has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.755% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WW International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Interactive Strength offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WW International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Strength pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WW International quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Interactive Strength quarterly revenues of $2M. WW International's net income of -$72.6M is lower than Interactive Strength's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, WW International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Interactive Strength's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WW International is 0.04x versus 0.05x for Interactive Strength. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.