TURN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -3.92%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bridge Investment Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could fall by -6.02%. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays out 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $103.4M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridge Investment Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 1.87x for Bridge Investment Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -2.73%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -0.64%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.61 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays out -305.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues of $579.8M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of -$15.8M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 1.62x for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Financial Gravity Companies has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of --. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat Financial Gravity Companies's return on equity of --.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Financial Gravity Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 180 Degree Capital has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Companies, analysts believe 180 Degree Capital is more attractive than Financial Gravity Companies.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Companies has a beta of -0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.749%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Financial Gravity Companies quarterly revenues of --. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Financial Gravity Companies's net income of --. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Financial Gravity Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 2.85x for Financial Gravity Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -5.16%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -8.19% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -47.16%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of $63.14 which suggests that it could grow by 63.16%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.254% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 1.760, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.022%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $239.7M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is 117.41x versus 0.53x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.