TURN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Financial Gravity Companies has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of --. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71% beat Financial Gravity Companies's return on equity of --.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Financial Gravity Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 180 Degree Capital has higher upside potential than Financial Gravity Companies, analysts believe 180 Degree Capital is more attractive than Financial Gravity Companies.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Financial Gravity Companies has a beta of -1.019, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.882%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Financial Gravity Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Financial Gravity Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Financial Gravity Companies quarterly revenues of --. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Financial Gravity Companies's net income of --. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Financial Gravity Companies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is -- versus 4.62x for Financial Gravity Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -5.94%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 8.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $2.8M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 18.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is -- versus 6.55x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of 23.62%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 13.79%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $91.93 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that Northern Trust has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe Northern Trust is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.817%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 59.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $464.9M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is -- versus 2.65x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingTree has a net margin of -- compared to 180 Degree Capital's net margin of -22.23%. 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71% beat LendingTree's return on equity of -30.49%.

180 Degree Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LendingTree has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 71.36%. Given that LendingTree has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe LendingTree is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, which suggesting that the stock is 13.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingTree has a beta of 2.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.862%.

180 Degree Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LendingTree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 180 Degree Capital pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LendingTree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LendingTree quarterly revenues of $260.8M. 180 Degree Capital's net income of -- is lower than LendingTree's net income of -$58M. Notably, 180 Degree Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LendingTree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 180 Degree Capital is -- versus 0.68x for LendingTree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.