Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Sell
45
SWIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.44
Seasonality move
:
124.08%
Day range:
$1.82 - $2.15
52-week range:
$1.28 - $72.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
4.17x
P/B ratio:
3.33x
Volume:
296.4K
Avg. volume:
166.1K
1-year change:
-26.77%
Market cap:
$29.7M
Revenue:
$4.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$424M | $1.25 | 39.61% | 74.83% | $120.96 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
$1.86 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.17x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$80.63 | $120.96 | $11.1B | 19.78x | $2.00 | 0% | 7.63x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$1.34 | -- | $51.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.05x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$0.56 | -- | $11.4M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 5.77x |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
$1.16 | -- | $10.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.57 | -- | $58.1M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.23x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -4.897 | -- | 1.04x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
12.53% | -0.177 | 3.97% | 0.64x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | -1.567 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -0.028 | -- | 56.19x |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | 0.110 | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.472 | -- | 3.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SWIN
Solowin Holdings
|
-- | -- | -58.97% | -58.97% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$360.4M | $222M | 14.51% | 17.23% | 50.39% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
PWM
Prestige Wealth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
Solowin Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of 38.45%. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M FUTUFutu Holdings81.81% $1.21 $4.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.84%. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $120.96 which suggests that it could grow by 50.02%. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Futu Holdings, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Futu Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings9 2 0 -
Is SWIN or FUTU More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or FUTU?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $440.5M. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 4.17x versus 7.63x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings4.17x -- -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings7.63x 19.78x $440.5M $169.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.84%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MATH More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 187.152%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MATH?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 4.17x versus 2.05x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings4.17x -- -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding2.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.84%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or MEGL More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -326.97% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or MEGL?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 4.17x versus 5.77x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings4.17x -- -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global5.77x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or PWM?
Prestige Wealth has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat Prestige Wealth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M PWMPrestige Wealth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or PWM?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.84%. On the other hand Prestige Wealth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than Prestige Wealth, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than Prestige Wealth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 PWMPrestige Wealth0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or PWM More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Wealth has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or PWM?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prestige Wealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Wealth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or PWM?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prestige Wealth quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Prestige Wealth's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prestige Wealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 4.17x versus -- for Prestige Wealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings4.17x -- -- -- PWMPrestige Wealth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SWIN or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Solowin Holdings's net margin of --. Solowin Holdings's return on equity of -58.97% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SWINSolowin Holdings-- -- $8.9M TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.84%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Solowin Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Solowin Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SWINSolowin Holdings0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is SWIN or TOP More Risky?
Solowin Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Solowin Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SWIN or TOP?
Solowin Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Solowin Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Solowin Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Solowin Holdings is 4.17x versus 6.23x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SWINSolowin Holdings4.17x -- -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group6.23x 61.61x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Why Buy Domino’s Pizza Stock?
When you think of growth stocks, you probably imagine technology…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 121x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
70
OKLO alert for Jan 6
Oklo [OKLO] is up 10.09% over the past day.
Sell
39
DOGZ alert for Jan 6
Dogness (International) [DOGZ] is up 3.39% over the past day.
Buy
66
DMRC alert for Jan 6
Digimarc [DMRC] is up 1.05% over the past day.
