SGBX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Griffon Corp. has a net margin of -505.7% compared to Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 6.59%. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -194.98% beat Griffon Corp.'s return on equity of 31.73%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283643.84%. On the other hand Griffon Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $101.29 which suggests that it could grow by 38.27%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Griffon Corp., analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Griffon Corp..

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.438% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon Corp. has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.051%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Griffon Corp. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon Corp. pays out 65.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Griffon Corp. quarterly revenues of $662.2M. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.3M is lower than Griffon Corp.'s net income of $43.6M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Griffon Corp.'s PE ratio is 73.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is 0.22x versus 1.35x for Griffon Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products Corp. has a net margin of -505.7% compared to Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -55.73%. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -194.98% beat Quanex Building Products Corp.'s return on equity of -33.09%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283643.84%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 104.98%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Quanex Building Products Corp., analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Quanex Building Products Corp..

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.438% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products Corp. has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.998%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products Corp. offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products Corp. pays out 35.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products Corp. quarterly revenues of $495.3M. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.3M is higher than Quanex Building Products Corp.'s net income of -$276M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is 0.22x versus 0.35x for Quanex Building Products Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power, Inc. has a net margin of -505.7% compared to Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -205.31%. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -194.98% beat Plug Power, Inc.'s return on equity of -105.89%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283643.84%. On the other hand Plug Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 25.03%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Plug Power, Inc., analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Plug Power, Inc..

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.438% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power, Inc. has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.116%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Plug Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.3M is higher than Plug Power, Inc.'s net income of -$363.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is 0.22x versus 3.42x for Plug Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision Corp. has a net margin of -505.7% compared to Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 9.08%. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -194.98% beat Techprecision Corp.'s return on equity of -5.33%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 283643.84%. On the other hand Techprecision Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Techprecision Corp., analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Techprecision Corp..

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.438% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision Corp. has a beta of 0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.116%.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Techprecision Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$5.3M is lower than Techprecision Corp.'s net income of $825K. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Techprecision Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. is 0.22x versus 1.35x for Techprecision Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.