RDFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avalon Globocare has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of -486.5%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Avalon Globocare's return on equity of -183.88%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.79%. On the other hand Avalon Globocare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than Avalon Globocare, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than Avalon Globocare.

Redfin has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avalon Globocare has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.211%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avalon Globocare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Avalon Globocare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are larger than Avalon Globocare quarterly revenues of $345.2K. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than Avalon Globocare's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avalon Globocare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.04x versus 2.74x for Avalon Globocare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of 37.91%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 0.56%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.79%. On the other hand Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $9.80 which suggests that it could grow by 2.19%. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance.

Redfin has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.098%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 11.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance pays out -165.69% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are larger than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $68.6M. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's net income of $26M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 164.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.04x versus 7.42x for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crown Castle has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of -43.73%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.79%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.11 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Redfin has higher upside potential than Crown Castle, analysts believe Redfin is more attractive than Crown Castle.

Redfin has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.215%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.04x versus 7.63x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a net margin of -41.86% compared to Redfin's net margin of 2.24%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity of 1.38%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of $10.62, signalling upside risk potential of 21.79%. On the other hand Chatham Lodging Trust has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.94%. Given that Chatham Lodging Trust has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.498, which suggesting that the stock is 149.849% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.619%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chatham Lodging Trust offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Redfin pays -0.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 535.96% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $221M, which are larger than Chatham Lodging Trust quarterly revenues of $68.6M. Redfin's net income of -$92.5M is lower than Chatham Lodging Trust's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chatham Lodging Trust's PE ratio is 116.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.04x versus 1.08x for Chatham Lodging Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.