RDFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Easterly Government Properties has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of 6.5%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Easterly Government Properties's return on equity of 1.33%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Easterly Government Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.88%. Given that Easterly Government Properties has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Easterly Government Properties is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.629, which suggesting that the stock is 162.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Easterly Government Properties has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.343%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Easterly Government Properties offers a yield of 9.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Easterly Government Properties pays out 597.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are larger than Easterly Government Properties quarterly revenues of $74.8M. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Easterly Government Properties's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Easterly Government Properties's PE ratio is 65.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 3.85x for Easterly Government Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynex Capital has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of 78.07%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Dynex Capital's return on equity of 9.03%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Dynex Capital has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.73%. Given that Dynex Capital has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Dynex Capital is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.629, which suggesting that the stock is 162.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynex Capital has a beta of 1.317, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.707%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynex Capital offers a yield of 12.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynex Capital pays out -1517.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are larger than Dynex Capital quarterly revenues of $39.7M. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than Dynex Capital's net income of $31M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dynex Capital's PE ratio is 9.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 6.63x for Dynex Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of -0.69%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.86%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.629, which suggesting that the stock is 162.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.421%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is lower than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 0.44x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of -12.15% compared to Redfin's net margin of -5.67%. Redfin's return on equity of -1694.25% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -40.82%.

Redfin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.07%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Redfin, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Redfin.

Redfin has a beta of 2.629, which suggesting that the stock is 162.89% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Redfin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Redfin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Redfin quarterly revenues are $278M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Redfin's net income of -$33.8M is higher than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$78M. Notably, Redfin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Redfin is 1.00x versus 0.24x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.