HEAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Turtle Beach's net margin of -17%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 4.69% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity of -12.03%.

Turtle Beach has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.56%. On the other hand Corsair Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that Turtle Beach has higher upside potential than Corsair Gaming, analysts believe Turtle Beach is more attractive than Corsair Gaming.

Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corsair Gaming has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Turtle Beach has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corsair Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turtle Beach pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corsair Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Turtle Beach quarterly revenues are $94.4M, which are smaller than Corsair Gaming quarterly revenues of $304.2M. Turtle Beach's net income of $3.4M is higher than Corsair Gaming's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, Turtle Beach's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.94x while Corsair Gaming's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turtle Beach is 1.07x versus 0.63x for Corsair Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koss has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Turtle Beach's net margin of -13.1%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 4.69% beat Koss's return on equity of -3.57%.

Turtle Beach has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.56%. On the other hand Koss has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Turtle Beach has higher upside potential than Koss, analysts believe Turtle Beach is more attractive than Koss.

Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koss has a beta of -0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.012%.

Turtle Beach has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koss offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turtle Beach pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koss pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Turtle Beach quarterly revenues are $94.4M, which are larger than Koss quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Turtle Beach's net income of $3.4M is higher than Koss's net income of -$419.5K. Notably, Turtle Beach's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.94x while Koss's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turtle Beach is 1.07x versus 6.02x for Koss. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Turtle Beach's net margin of -32.18%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 4.69% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.06%.

Turtle Beach has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.56%. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 822%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Turtle Beach, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Turtle Beach.

Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.088%.

Turtle Beach has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turtle Beach pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Turtle Beach quarterly revenues are $94.4M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Turtle Beach's net income of $3.4M is higher than Emerson Radio's net income of -$881K. Notably, Turtle Beach's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.94x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turtle Beach is 1.07x versus 1.17x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Electronics has a net margin of 3.62% compared to Turtle Beach's net margin of -2.6%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 4.69% beat Universal Electronics's return on equity of -15.63%.

Turtle Beach has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.56%. On the other hand Universal Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.43%. Given that Universal Electronics has higher upside potential than Turtle Beach, analysts believe Universal Electronics is more attractive than Turtle Beach.

Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.073, which suggesting that the stock is 107.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.452%.

Turtle Beach has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turtle Beach pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Turtle Beach quarterly revenues are $94.4M, which are smaller than Universal Electronics quarterly revenues of $102.1M. Turtle Beach's net income of $3.4M is higher than Universal Electronics's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Turtle Beach's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.94x while Universal Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turtle Beach is 1.07x versus 0.35x for Universal Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.