GAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of -13.1% compared to GAN's net margin of -9.68%. GAN's return on equity of -870.33% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

GAN has a consensus price target of $1.97, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 42.33%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than GAN, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than GAN.

GAN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.446%.

GAN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GAN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GAN quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. GAN's net income of -$4.2M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, GAN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAN is 0.61x versus 4.18x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -13.1% compared to GAN's net margin of 3.43%. GAN's return on equity of -870.33% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 0.95%.

GAN has a consensus price target of $1.97, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $319.90 which suggests that it could grow by 29.78%. Given that Flutter Entertainment PLC has higher upside potential than GAN, analysts believe Flutter Entertainment PLC is more attractive than GAN.

GAN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.248%.

GAN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GAN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GAN quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.8B. GAN's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $130M. Notably, GAN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 1,120.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAN is 0.61x versus 3.17x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -13.1% compared to GAN's net margin of 0.8%. GAN's return on equity of -870.33% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 1.32%.

GAN has a consensus price target of $1.97, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $15.86 which suggests that it could grow by 39.83%. Given that Rush Street Interactive has higher upside potential than GAN, analysts believe Rush Street Interactive is more attractive than GAN.

GAN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GAN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GAN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GAN quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are smaller than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $254.2M. GAN's net income of -$4.2M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $2M. Notably, GAN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 604.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAN is 0.61x versus 1.47x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of -13.1% compared to GAN's net margin of -109.62%. GAN's return on equity of -870.33% beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of 15958.29%.

GAN has a consensus price target of $1.97, signalling upside risk potential of 10.06%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GAN has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe GAN is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

GAN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.782%.

GAN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GAN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GAN quarterly revenues are $31.7M, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $823.4K. GAN's net income of -$4.2M is lower than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$902.7K. Notably, GAN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GAN is 0.61x versus 0.32x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.