Financhill
Sell
42

FGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$21.50
Seasonality move :
1.45%
Day range:
$21.50 - $22.00
52-week range:
$14.21 - $38.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
0.54x
P/S ratio:
0.37x
P/B ratio:
0.45x
Volume:
17.4K
Avg. volume:
47.4K
1-year change:
-31.12%
Market cap:
$27.3M
Revenue:
$23.7M
EPS (TTM):
$40.12

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FGF
Fundamental Global
-- -- -- -- --
ACT
Enact Holdings
$310.3M $1.08 3.59% 8.64% $38.60
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
$925.1M $2.82 214.31% 33.02% --
ROOT
Root
$287.8M -$0.38 44.77% -78.05% $83.00
SKWD
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
$292.6M $0.73 17.55% -9.47% $54.00
TRUP
Trupanion
$335.4M $0.84 13.52% -- $53.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FGF
Fundamental Global
$21.55 -- $27.3M 0.54x $0.00 0% 0.37x
ACT
Enact Holdings
$33.60 $38.60 $5.2B 7.69x $0.19 2.13% 4.41x
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
$388.95 -- $20.3B 36.38x $1.37 1.33% 5.48x
ROOT
Root
$129.34 $83.00 $2B -- $0.00 0% 1.88x
SKWD
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
$49.86 $54.00 $2B 15.20x $0.00 0% 1.87x
TRUP
Trupanion
$49.63 $53.50 $2.1B -- $0.00 0% 1.68x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FGF
Fundamental Global
3.18% 2.855 4.93% 3.72x
ACT
Enact Holdings
12.95% 1.074 14.94% --
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
-- 1.201 0.21% 1.35x
ROOT
Root
62.32% 9.451 53.1% 12.88x
SKWD
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
12.98% 1.830 7.28% 7.64x
TRUP
Trupanion
28.7% 1.282 7.25% 1.61x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FGF
Fundamental Global
-- -- 38.37% 40.42% -29.65% -$30K
ACT
Enact Holdings
-- -- 12.32% 14.21% 72.94% $188.1M
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
-- -- 31.85% 31.85% 16.38% --
ROOT
Root
-- -- -3.25% -9.03% 11.25% $47M
SKWD
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
-- -- 16.61% 19.6% 16.25% $167.6M
TRUP
Trupanion
$49.4M $20.1M -3.1% -4.42% 1.61% $13.4M

Fundamental Global vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FGF or ACT?

    Enact Holdings has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 53.93%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    -- $15.06 $85.9M
    ACT
    Enact Holdings
    -- $1.05 $5.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About FGF or ACT?

    Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enact Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $38.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0 0 0
    ACT
    Enact Holdings
    1 3 0
  • Is FGF or ACT More Risky?

    Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGF or ACT?

    Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enact Holdings offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGF or ACT?

    Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Enact Holdings quarterly revenues of $301.8M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Enact Holdings's net income of $162.7M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Enact Holdings's PE ratio is 7.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 4.41x for Enact Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0.37x 0.54x $17.5M $17.7M
    ACT
    Enact Holdings
    4.41x 7.69x $301.8M $162.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FGF or ERIE?

    Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 13.04%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    -- $15.06 $85.9M
    ERIE
    Erie Indemnity
    -- $3.06 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About FGF or ERIE?

    Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fundamental Global has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Fundamental Global is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0 0 0
    ERIE
    Erie Indemnity
    1 0 0
  • Is FGF or ERIE More Risky?

    Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.263%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGF or ERIE?

    Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGF or ERIE?

    Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 36.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 5.48x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0.37x 0.54x $17.5M $17.7M
    ERIE
    Erie Indemnity
    5.48x 36.38x $1.2B $159.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns FGF or ROOT?

    Root has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 7.46%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    -- $15.06 $85.9M
    ROOT
    Root
    -- $1.35 $482.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About FGF or ROOT?

    Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could fall by -35.83%. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0 0 0
    ROOT
    Root
    1 4 0
  • Is FGF or ROOT More Risky?

    Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGF or ROOT?

    Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGF or ROOT?

    Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 1.88x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0.37x 0.54x $17.5M $17.7M
    ROOT
    Root
    1.88x -- $305.7M $22.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns FGF or SKWD?

    Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 12.14%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    -- $15.06 $85.9M
    SKWD
    Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
    -- $0.89 $916.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About FGF or SKWD?

    Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.3%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0 0 0
    SKWD
    Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
    5 4 0
  • Is FGF or SKWD More Risky?

    Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGF or SKWD?

    Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGF or SKWD?

    Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 1.87x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0.37x 0.54x $17.5M $17.7M
    SKWD
    Skyward Specialty Insurance Group
    1.87x 15.20x $302M $36.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns FGF or TRUP?

    Trupanion has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 0.44%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    -- $15.06 $85.9M
    TRUP
    Trupanion
    15.08% $0.03 $449.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About FGF or TRUP?

    Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $53.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0 0 0
    TRUP
    Trupanion
    3 3 0
  • Is FGF or TRUP More Risky?

    Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.539%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FGF or TRUP?

    Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FGF or TRUP?

    Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.54x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 1.68x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FGF
    Fundamental Global
    0.37x 0.54x $17.5M $17.7M
    TRUP
    Trupanion
    1.68x -- $327.5M $1.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

David Bahnsen Dividend Strategy
David Bahnsen Dividend Strategy

David Bahnsen – founder of The Bahnsen Group and author…

Is Netflix a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Netflix a Buy, Sell or Hold?

If there is one company that can be termed a…

Why Is Tesla Stock Falling?
Why Is Tesla Stock Falling?

Tesla stock reached an all-time high of $479.86 on December…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 116x

Sell
47
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
87
PCOR alert for Feb 15

Procore Technologies [PCOR] is up 16.3% over the past day.

Buy
54
DKNG alert for Feb 15

DraftKings [DKNG] is up 15.24% over the past day.

Sell
30
TWLO alert for Feb 15

Twilio [TWLO] is down 15.01% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock