BRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California Resources Corp. has a net margin of -16.7% compared to Berry Corp.'s net margin of 7.29%. Berry Corp.'s return on equity of -13.37% beat California Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 11.03%.

Berry Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.1000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand California Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $64.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.03%. Given that California Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Berry Corp., analysts believe California Resources Corp. is more attractive than Berry Corp..

Berry Corp. has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.811%.

Berry Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. California Resources Corp. offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Berry Corp. pays 232% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources Corp. pays out 30.2% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp.'s is not.

Berry Corp. quarterly revenues are $155.8M, which are smaller than California Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $878M. Berry Corp.'s net income of -$26M is lower than California Resources Corp.'s net income of $64M. Notably, Berry Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.09x while California Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Corp. is 0.37x versus 1.11x for California Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has a net margin of -16.7% compared to Berry Corp.'s net margin of -5.55%. Berry Corp.'s return on equity of -13.37% beat Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.54%.

Berry Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.1000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.27 which suggests that it could grow by 8.17%. Given that Berry Corp. has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, Inc., analysts believe Berry Corp. is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne, Inc..

Berry Corp. has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.274%.

Berry Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Berry Corp. pays 232% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. pays out 44.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp.'s is not.

Berry Corp. quarterly revenues are $155.8M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Berry Corp.'s net income of -$26M is higher than Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s net income of -$56.1M. Notably, Berry Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.09x while Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Corp. is 0.37x versus 0.74x for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp. Plc has a net margin of -16.7% compared to Berry Corp.'s net margin of -2.64%. Berry Corp.'s return on equity of -13.37% beat Noble Corp. Plc's return on equity of 4.9%.

Berry Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.1000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Noble Corp. Plc has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.4%. Given that Berry Corp. has higher upside potential than Noble Corp. Plc, analysts believe Berry Corp. is more attractive than Noble Corp. Plc.

Berry Corp. has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp. Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Berry Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Noble Corp. Plc offers a yield of 7.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Berry Corp. pays 232% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp. Plc pays out 60.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp. Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp.'s is not.

Berry Corp. quarterly revenues are $155.8M, which are smaller than Noble Corp. Plc quarterly revenues of $798M. Berry Corp.'s net income of -$26M is lower than Noble Corp. Plc's net income of -$21.1M. Notably, Berry Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.09x while Noble Corp. Plc's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Corp. is 0.37x versus 1.32x for Noble Corp. Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -16.7% compared to Berry Corp.'s net margin of -3.1%. Berry Corp.'s return on equity of -13.37% beat Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.96%.

Berry Corp. has a consensus price target of $4.1000, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.20 which suggests that it could grow by 21.77%. Given that Berry Corp. has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., analysts believe Berry Corp. is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc..

Berry Corp. has a beta of 0.849, which suggesting that the stock is 15.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.245%.

Berry Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Berry Corp. pays 232% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. pays out 13.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Berry Corp.'s is not.

Berry Corp. quarterly revenues are $155.8M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Berry Corp.'s net income of -$26M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$36.5M. Notably, Berry Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 51.09x while Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Corp. is 0.37x versus 0.47x for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.