BGFV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of 8.33%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 216.9%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could fall by -0.74%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Dick's Sporting Goods.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.617%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 1.25x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of -53.78%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 216.9%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.43%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than 1-800-Flowers.com, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than 1-800-Flowers.com.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.898%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 0.21x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GHST World has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of -663.13%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat GHST World's return on equity of --.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 216.9%. On the other hand GHST World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than GHST World, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than GHST World.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GHST World has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.686%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GHST World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. GHST World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are larger than GHST World quarterly revenues of $4.8K. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than GHST World's net income of -$31.5K. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GHST World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 141.22x for GHST World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of -8.53%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 216.9%. On the other hand Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.20 which suggests that it could fall by -9.09%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.671, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.894%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are smaller than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues of $249.1M. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is higher than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 0.11x for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.