ANSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 32.05% compared to Ansys's net margin of 18.49%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.17% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $356.14, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $882.2M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Ansys's net income of $282.7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.40x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 50.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 10.72x versus 9.10x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 32.05% compared to Ansys's net margin of 25.09%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.17% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $356.14, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $317.85 which suggests that it could grow by 27.7%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.826%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $882.2M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Ansys's net income of $282.7M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.40x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 64.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 10.72x versus 14.69x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 32.05% compared to Ansys's net margin of 34.62%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.17% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $356.14, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $503.86 which suggests that it could grow by 35.05%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $882.2M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Ansys's net income of $282.7M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.40x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 10.72x versus 10.65x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 32.05% compared to Ansys's net margin of 20.32%. Ansys's return on equity of 10.17% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 26.4%.

Ansys has a consensus price target of $356.14, signalling upside risk potential of 14.72%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $622.66 which suggests that it could grow by 49.05%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Ansys.

Ansys has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.677%.

Ansys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ansys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ansys quarterly revenues are $882.2M, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Ansys's net income of $282.7M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $295.7M. Notably, Ansys's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.40x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 30.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ansys is 10.72x versus 10.74x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.